Contrary to its 'Age of Reason' moniker, the Enlightenment's key advance was acknowledging human fallibility. This humility challenged the absolute certainty of earlier philosophies which used pure reason to justify dogma like geocentrism. Accepting the limits of reason opened the door to empirical evidence and intellectual dissent.

The widely held view of Spanish colonial brutality wasn't just Protestant propaganda. It originated from firsthand accounts by Spanish conquistadors and priests like Bartolomé de las Casas. This internal criticism and moral debate over the treatment of indigenous peoples was present from the conquest's very beginning.

The Spanish conquest was characterized by the systematic destruction of Inca art. Rather than preserving priceless golden artifacts like llamas and flowers, they melted them into standardized bars for easy shipment and accounting. This reflects a colonial mindset that prioritizes raw monetary value over cultural and artistic significance.

The current era of tribal, narrative-driven media mirrors the pre-Enlightenment period of vicious religious wars fueled by moral certainty. The historical Enlightenment arose because society grew exhausted by this violence, suggesting that a return to reason and impartiality may only follow a similar period of societal burnout.

Contrary to modern narratives, historical writings from colonized peoples, such as Egyptians in the 1800s, praised the colonial period for bringing advancements in science, technology, and medicine, viewing it as a time of progress.

The foundation of 80 years of global prosperity under Western influence wasn't just capitalism, but a core belief: since truth is advantageous but hard to find, society must protect individual sovereignty and free inquiry. This allows for innovation and progress by letting people be free to explore and even be wrong.

By casting their empire as a reflection of cosmic order, the Persians implicitly defined all outside peoples as living in a state of chaos and 'the lie.' This created an ideological justification for perpetual conquest, as bringing foreigners into the empire was framed as a moral duty to spread universal truth.

The Enlightenment offered a nuanced view of human nature, rejecting both the religious doctrine of inherent sinfulness and Rousseau's idea of a pure 'noble savage' corrupted by society. Instead, thinkers like Adam Smith proposed that humans are fallible but can be improved and socialized through societal living, a foundational concept for modern liberalism.

The idea that growing wealth and education automatically lead to more compassionate values is historically false. Wealthy societies, from the Roman Empire to 18th-century Europe and Belle Époque France, have often been the most deeply committed to slavery and colonialism, using their resources to create more efficient systems of oppression.