Separate your workflow into two steps. Use a less expensive model like ChatGPT for the conversational, clarification-heavy task of building the perfect prompt. Then, use the more powerful (and costly) Claude model specifically for the code-generation task to maximize its value and save tokens.
Related Insights
For niche tasks, leverage an AI model with deep domain knowledge (like Claude for its own 'Skills' feature) to create highly specific prompts. Then, feed these optimized prompts into a powerful, generalist coding assistant (like Google's) to achieve a more accurate and robust final product.
When working with multiple AI tools (e.g., an LLM for strategy, another for code, a third for images), delegate the task of writing prompts to your main AI partner. Explain your goal, and have it generate the precise instructions for the other tools. This saves time and ensures greater precision in your communications across a complex AI stack.
A powerful AI workflow involves two stages. First, use a standard LLM like Claude for brainstorming and generating text-based plans. Then, package that context and move the project to a coding-focused AI like Claude Code to build the actual software or digital asset, such as a landing page.
Instead of prompting a specialized AI tool directly, experts employ a meta-workflow. They first use a general LLM like ChatGPT or Claude to generate a detailed, context-rich 'master prompt' based on a PRD or user story, which they then paste into the specialized tool for superior results.
Before using a dedicated AI prototyping tool, run your prompt through Claude.ai first. Its artifact generation provides a quick, lightweight visual of the prompt's output, allowing you to catch errors and refine the prompt without wasting time or credits on a more robust platform.
Achieve higher-quality results by using an AI to first generate an outline or plan. Then, refine that plan with follow-up prompts before asking for the final execution. This course-corrects early and avoids wasted time on flawed one-shot outputs, ultimately saving time.
To optimize AI agent costs and avoid usage limits, adopt a “brain vs. muscles” strategy. Use a high-capability model like Claude Opus for strategic thinking and planning. Then, instruct it to delegate execution-heavy tasks, like writing code, to more specialized and cost-effective models like Codex.
To optimize costs, users configure powerful models like Claude Opus as the 'brain' to strategize and delegate execution tasks (e.g. coding) to cheaper, specialized models like ChatGPT's Codec, treating them as muscles.
Don't pay for Claude's most expensive tier just for coding. A hybrid approach uses the cheaper Claude Pro plan for its superior file-handling and writing. For heavy coding, switch to the terminal inside Cursor, which provides access to top models like Opus for only $20/month, creating a powerful stack for under $40.
To optimize AI costs in development, use powerful, expensive models for creative and strategic tasks like architecture and research. Once a solid plan is established, delegate the step-by-step code execution to less powerful, more affordable models that excel at following instructions.
