Don't pay for Claude's most expensive tier just for coding. A hybrid approach uses the cheaper Claude Pro plan for its superior file-handling and writing. For heavy coding, switch to the terminal inside Cursor, which provides access to top models like Opus for only $20/month, creating a powerful stack for under $40.
Related Insights
As underlying AI models become more capable, the need for complex user interfaces diminishes. The team abandoned feature-rich IDEs like Cursor for Claude Code's simple terminal text box because the model's power now handles the complexity, making a minimal UI more efficient.
The power of tools like Claude Code comes from giving the AI access to fundamental command-line tools (e.g., `bash`, `grep`). This allows the AI to compose novel solutions and lets product teams define new features using simple English prompts rather than hard-coded logic.
Structure your development workflow to leverage the AI agent as a parallel processor. While you focus on a hands-on coding task in the main editor window, delegate a separate, non-blocking task (like scaffolding a new route) to the agent in a side panel, allowing it to "cook in the background."
LLMs often get stuck or pursue incorrect paths on complex tasks. "Plan mode" forces Claude Code to present its step-by-step checklist for your approval before it starts editing files. This allows you to correct its logic and assumptions upfront, ensuring the final output aligns with your intent and saving time.
Claude Code's terminal-based interaction within a specific folder allows it to automatically read and reference local files. This makes "context engineering" drastically faster and more powerful than manually pasting information into a traditional chat interface, as the context is implicitly understood.
Instead of writing Python or TypeScript to prototype an AI agent, PM Dennis Yang writes a "super MVP" using plain English instructions directly in Cursor. He leverages Cursor's built-in agentic capabilities, model switching, and tool-calling to test the agent's logic and flow without writing a single line of code.
While "vibe coding" tools are excellent for sparking interest and building initial prototypes, transitioning a project into a maintainable product requires learning the underlying code. AI code editors like Cursor act as the next step, helping users bridge the gap from prompt-based generation to hands-on software engineering.
Instead of relying on a single, all-purpose coding agent, the most effective workflow involves using different agents for their specific strengths. For example, using the 'Friday' agent for UI tasks, 'Charlie' for code reviews, and 'Claude Code' for research and backend logic.
A seasoned CTO finds negligible performance differences between major AI coding tools (Claude, CodeX, Cursor) for rapid prototyping. The primary value is speed, not marginal accuracy. Subscribing to multiple services is more for staying current with market trends than for a specific tool's superiority.
Instead of using Claude's slow and error-prone web UI to generate skills, a more effective workflow is to use an AI-native code editor like Cursor. By providing Cursor with the official documentation link, it can rapidly and reliably generate the entire skill folder structure, including markdown and validation scripts.
