Indiegogo co-founder Slava Rubin was replaced as CEO by the board due to a conflict over prioritizing aggressive growth versus unit economics. He argues that removing a founder too early can handicap a company's potential and cause it to miss larger market opportunities.
Related Insights
A founder's real boss is their customer base. While keeping a board happy is important, some CEOs become so consumed with managing up that they lose sight of the product and customer needs, ultimately driving the company off a cliff despite running perfect board meetings.
Founder Alex Marechniak stepped down as CEO not from a lack of skill, but because personal crises and burnout depleted his capacity. He recognized that leadership requires being "fully in the game," and transparently told his board he wasn't, prioritizing the company's health over his ego.
A CEO who stays too long creates an organization optimized to respond only to them, causing other skills and response mechanisms to weaken. Leadership changes are healthy because they force a company to develop a more balanced and resilient set of capabilities, breaking the imperial CEO model.
Despite success, founder Kevin Wagstaff felt like an "imposter" as the company scaled beyond $10M ARR. He recognized his strengths were in the early, scrappy "bias to action" phase, not managing a larger organization. He proactively brought in a seasoned CEO better suited for the next stage of growth.
Even with full board support, a successor CEO may lack the intrinsic 'moral authority' to make drastic 'burn the boats' decisions. This courage is harder to summon without the deep-seated capital a founder naturally possesses, making company-altering transformation more challenging for an outsider.
Raising significant venture capital diluted founder Ty Haney's ownership to just 10%. When strategic disagreements arose with the board over growth, she lacked the decision-making control to steer the company, leading to an untenable situation and her forced departure.
Successor CEOs cannot replicate the founder's all-encompassing "working memory" of the company and its products. Recognizing this is key. The role must shift from knowing everything to building a cohesive team and focusing on the few strategic decisions only the CEO can make.
Bumble's founder believes the initial, all-consuming obsession is critical for getting a startup off the ground. However, this same intensity becomes a liability as the company matures. Leaders must evolve and create distance to gain the perspective needed for long-term growth and to avoid stifling opportunity.
Founders remain long after hired executives depart, inheriting the outcomes of past choices. This long-term ownership is a powerful justification for founders to stay deeply involved in key decisions, trusting their unique context over an expert's resume.
