In an environment of extreme government intervention and currency debasement—the very problems it was created to solve—Bitcoin is not performing as expected. The asset feels "co-opted" by financial engineering, leading original believers ("OGs") to sell as they see the core vision straying.
Related Insights
Bitcoin's core properties (fixed supply, perfect portability) make it a superior safe haven to gold. However, the market currently treats it as a volatile, risk-on asset. This perception gap represents a unique, transitional moment in financial history.
The argument that 'Bitcoin fixes this' ignores human reality. Its volatility and complexity create an insurmountable adoption barrier for the average person. The only practical solution for the masses is holding governments accountable, not mass crypto adoption.
Despite widespread institutional adoption and soaring prices, veteran financial editor Jim Grant maintains a deeply skeptical view of Bitcoin. He considers it a fundamentally valueless asset propped up by hype and questionable promotions, dismissing its utility and concluding its most efficient and logical price is zero.
While private crypto has scams, the true systemic risk is Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). Being programmable and centralized, they give governments the power to monitor, block, and control every citizen's transactions, creating an infrastructure for authoritarian control under the guise of progress.
Bitcoin's 27% plunge, far exceeding the stock market's dip, shows how high-beta assets react disproportionately to macro uncertainty. When the central bank signals a slowdown due to a "foggy" outlook, investors flee to safety, punishing the riskiest assets the most.
Technologies like AI and robotics create massive deflationary pressures. To counteract this, governments will be forced to print more fiat currency, debasing it. This macro environment makes a scarce, decentralized asset like Bitcoin a critical tool for corporations to preserve capital and protect their balance sheets from inflation.
During episodes of US government dysfunction, such as shutdowns, the dollar tends to weaken against alternative reserve assets. The concurrent strength in gold and Bitcoin provides tangible market validation for the 'dollar debasement' thesis, suggesting investors are actively seeking havens from perceived fiscal mismanagement.
The primary driver of Bitcoin's recent appreciation isn't hardcore believers, but mainstream speculators who bought ETFs. These investors lack ideological commitment and will rush for the exits during a downturn, creating a mass liquidation event that the market's limited liquidity cannot absorb.
An investor's Bitcoin thesis rests on three pillars: 1) as a self-custodied asset for debanking/borderless scenarios, 2) as an investment for pure price appreciation ("number go up"), and 3) as an ethical holding to support a better financial system. This framework clarifies why proxies like MSTR satisfy the latter two needs but never the first.
A significant behavioral shift is underway in the Bitcoin market. Contrary to past cycles where they sold into price rallies, long-term holders are now consistently liquidating their positions during a period of price decline. This unprecedented selling pressure coincides with extreme capitulation from short-term holders.
