OpenAI's research shows a significant capabilities gap. While adoption is high, most workers use basic features like writing and search. Technical "power users" leverage advanced functions like custom GPTs, indicating a major need for company-wide training to unlock full productivity potential.
Related Insights
For professionals new to AI, the fastest way to get a tangible productivity boost is to use a paid plan like OpenAI's ($20) and create Custom GPTs. This low-barrier tool is exceptionally effective for automating repetitive tasks involving reading, summarizing, or transforming text.
For those without a technical background, the path to AI proficiency isn't coding but conversation. By treating models like a mentor, advisor, or strategic partner and experimenting with personal use cases, users can quickly develop an intuitive understanding of prompting and AI capabilities.
While many believe AI will primarily help average performers become great, LinkedIn's experience shows the opposite. Their top talent were the first and most effective adopters of new AI tools, using them to become even more productive. This suggests AI may amplify existing talent disparities.
When employees are 'too busy' to learn AI, don't just schedule more training. Instead, identify their most time-consuming task and build a specific AI tool (like a custom GPT) to solve it. This proves AI's value by giving them back time, creating the bandwidth and motivation needed for deeper learning.
Despite the hype around AI's coding prowess, an OpenAI study reveals it is a niche activity on consumer plans, accounting for only 4% of messages. The vast majority of usage is for more practical, everyday guidance like writing help, information seeking, and general advice.
Even professionals who use ChatGPT daily are often unaware of its most powerful "reasoning" capabilities, like Deep Research. This pervasive knowledge gap means users stick to basic tasks like writing, missing out on the profound strategic value these advanced features offer for complex problem-solving.
AI chat interfaces are often mistaken for simple, accessible tools. In reality, they are power-user interfaces that expose the raw capabilities of the underlying model. Achieving great results requires skill and virtuosity, much like mastering a complex tool.
The main barrier to AI's impact is not its technical flaws but the fact that most organizations don't understand what it can actually do. Advanced features like 'deep research' and reasoning models remain unused by over 95% of professionals, leaving immense potential and competitive advantage untapped.
The perceived limits of today's AI are not inherent to the models themselves but to our failure to build the right "agentic scaffold" around them. There's a "model capability overhang" where much more potential can be unlocked with better prompting, context engineering, and tool integrations.
The most significant recent AI advance is models' ability to use chain-of-thought reasoning, not just retrieve data. However, most business users are unaware of this 'deep research' capability and continue using AI as a simple search tool, missing its transformative potential for complex problem-solving.
