Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

The value of an operator-turned-VC's network and experience is finite and depreciates over time. LPs must assess how these managers are cultivating new nodes and relationships to stay relevant, as access to their original network fades years after their departure.

Related Insights

Traditional VC reliance on "differentiated networks" is obsolete as data sources and professional networks are now commodities. To compete, modern VCs must replace this outdated advantage with proprietary intelligence platforms that algorithmically source deals and identify the right signals for where to focus time.

A VC's network is a depreciating asset, not a permanent one. Connections from previous roles become stale within 3-5 years as new talent nodes emerge. This necessitates building a continuous, proactive engine for refreshing and expanding your network, rather than relying on past relationships.

VCs who spin out of tech giants like Airbnb have a powerful initial network. However, this edge typically expires after their third fund as original colleagues move on, forcing them to build a more durable, independent network to source deals.

The expectation for venture capitalists has shifted. Founders no longer just want finance professionals; they demand investors who have direct operational experience and have been "in the trenches" of building a company. This change reflects a move towards more hands-on, value-add investing.

The seed investing landscape isn't just expanding; it's actively replacing its previous generation. Legacy boutique seed firms are being squeezed by large multistage funds and new emerging managers, implying a VC's relevance has a 10-15 year cycle before a new cohort takes over.

Many VC firms hire former operators for their expertise, but success isn't guaranteed. The best operator-VCs avoid the urge to "backseat drive" the companies they fund. Instead, they leverage their experience with extraordinary humility, acting as a supportive advisor rather than a replacement CEO.

New investors should prioritize building a network that aligns with their fund's specific investment thesis. Generic networking is inefficient; focus on cultivating relationships with individuals who fit the fund's "ideal customer profile" to generate high-quality deal flow, as 80% of funded deals can come from this source.

The career arcs of venture and buyout investors differ starkly. VCs rely on networks relevant to young founders, leading some to retire by 45 as connections become stale. In contrast, buyout investing is an apprenticeship business where age and experience are increasingly valued.

Lior Susan highlights the biggest mental hurdle for former operators becoming VCs: internalizing the power law. Operators are builders wired to fix problems and believe they can turn any situation around. In VC, success is driven by a few massive outliers, requiring focus on winners, not on fixing every company.

The transition from a C-suite operator managing thousands to an investor is jarring. New VCs must adapt from leading large teams to being individual contributors who write their own memos and do their own sourcing. This "scaling down" ability, not just prior success, predicts their success as an investor.

Operator VCs Face a Finite "Shelf Life" on Their Network After Leaving a Company | RiffOn