Decades of underperformance, driven by government policy favoring other sectors, have left the commodities space (metals, oil & gas) without a new generation of "rockstar" investors. This talent and capital vacuum means that even small inflows from passive strategies could trigger outsized price moves as capital rotates.
Related Insights
The most significant long-term threat to the supply of critical materials isn't a lack of resources in the ground, but a lack of people. The aging workforce of geologists and mining engineers, with a shrinking pipeline of new talent, poses a greater systemic risk to the industry.
Contrary to popular belief, the market may be getting less efficient. The dominance of indexing, quant funds, and multi-manager pods—all with short time horizons—creates dislocations. This leaves opportunities for long-term investors to buy valuable assets that are neglected because their path to value creation is uncertain.
Metals are uniquely positioned to perform across multiple economic regimes. They serve as a hedge against national debt and central bank irresponsibility, benefit from potential rate cuts and sticky inflation, and face a massive supply-demand shock from the AI and energy infrastructure build-out.
In an era of financial repression and heavy government intervention, the most effective investment strategy is to identify sectors receiving direct government support. By positioning capital near these "money spigots," investors can benefit from policies designed to manage the economy, regardless of traditional market fundamentals.
Many commodity funds make bold macro predictions (e.g., on inflation) but take timid, diversified equity positions. A superior strategy is the reverse: maintain a neutral macro view while making concentrated, 'bold' bets on specific companies with powerful operational catalysts that generate alpha regardless of the macro environment.
For 50 years, commodity prices moved together, driven by synchronized global demand. J.P. Morgan identifies a breakdown of this trend since 2024, dubbing it the 'crocodile cycle,' where supply-side factors cause metals to outperform while energy underperforms, creating a widening gap like a crocodile's mouth.
While media outlets create hype cycles around certain critical materials like rare earths, other equally vital commodities such as tungsten and tin face similar geopolitical supply risks but receive far less attention. These 'un-hyped' bottlenecks present significant investment opportunities for diligent researchers.
The belief that investing in commodities is 'short human ingenuity' is flawed. These companies are R&D powerhouses in materials science, geology, and chemical engineering. ExxonMobil employs more PhDs than Apple, and their foundational innovations enable the consumer tech we see today.
The strategic value of commodities in a modern portfolio has shifted from generating returns to providing a crucial hedge against two growing threats. These are unsustainable fiscal policies that weaken currencies ('debasement risk') and the increasing use of commodities as geopolitical weapons that cause supply disruptions.
The market often loses interest in resource companies after the initial discovery pop. This 'orphan period,' when the project is being built and de-risked but not yet generating revenue, is the ideal time to invest at a discount before production begins.