AIs excel at exploring millions of problems at a surface level (breadth), a scale humans cannot match. Human experts provide the depth needed to tackle the difficult "islands" AIs identify. Science must shift from its current depth-focused model to one that first uses AI to map entire fields and clear away low-hanging fruit.

Contrary to sci-fi visions, the immediate future of AI in science is not the fully autonomous 'dark lab.' Prof. Welling's vision is to empower human domain experts with powerful tools. The scientist remains crucial for defining problems, interpreting results, and making final judgments, with AI as a powerful collaborator.

In high-stakes fields like pharma, AI's ability to generate more ideas (e.g., drug targets) is less valuable than its ability to aid in decision-making. Physical constraints on experimentation mean you can't test everything. The real need is for tools that help humans evaluate, prioritize, and gain conviction on a few key bets.

Major scientific discoveries don't just solve problems; they empower us to ask deeper, more ambitious questions that were previously inconceivable. Our expanding knowledge creates a larger frontier of ignorance, turning yesterday's breakthroughs into tomorrow's foundational tools for asking what's next.

The ultimate goal isn't just modeling specific systems (like protein folding), but automating the entire scientific method. This involves AI generating hypotheses, choosing experiments, analyzing results, and updating a 'world model' of a domain, creating a continuous loop of discovery.

A major frontier for AI in science is developing 'taste'—the human ability to discern not just if a research question is solvable, but if it is genuinely interesting and impactful. Models currently struggle to differentiate an exciting result from a boring one.

AI operates effectively within a given problem frame, but humans excel at questioning the frame itself. This ability to shift perspective and address a problem at a different level of abstraction—treating the root cause, not just the symptom—is a durable human skill that will remain critical in an AI-driven world.

Now that AI can churn out a competent, human-level research paper daily, the incentive for incremental work disappears. To stand out, the scientific community must leverage AI as a tool to raise its ambitions and tackle grander, more fundamental problems.

AI's key advantage isn't superior intelligence but the ability to brute-force enumerate and then rapidly filter a vast number of hypotheses against existing literature and data. This systematic, high-volume approach uncovers novel insights that intuition-driven human processes might miss.