Current AI excels at information gathering, similar to a junior analyst. However, it lacks the meta-level learning to develop true expertise from repeated tasks. This makes it a powerful tool for amplifying existing experts by handling tedious work, not replacing their decision-making capabilities.

Unlike fields with finite demand, the appetite for scientific discovery is infinite. Therefore, automating science won't displace scientists. Instead, it will create more questions and opportunities, transforming the scientist's role into a manager or 'wrangler' of AI systems that explore hundreds of ideas simultaneously.

Google is moving beyond AI as a mere analysis tool. The concept of an 'AI co-scientist' envisions AI as an active partner that helps sift through information, generate novel hypotheses, and outline ways to test them. This reframes the human-AI collaboration to fundamentally accelerate the scientific method itself.

In its current form, AI primarily benefits experts by amplifying their existing knowledge. An expert can provide better prompts due to a richer vocabulary and more effectively verify the output due to deep domain context. It's a tool that makes knowledgeable people more productive, not a replacement for their expertise.

In high-stakes fields like pharma, AI's ability to generate more ideas (e.g., drug targets) is less valuable than its ability to aid in decision-making. Physical constraints on experimentation mean you can't test everything. The real need is for tools that help humans evaluate, prioritize, and gain conviction on a few key bets.

Recognizing that scientists require varying levels of control, the system's autonomy can be dialed up or down. It can function as a simple experiment executor, a collaborative partner for brainstorming, or a fully autonomous discovery engine. This flexibility is designed to support, not replace, the human scientist.

Despite hype in areas like self-driving cars and medical diagnosis, AI has not replaced expert human judgment. Its most successful application is as a powerful assistant that augments human experts, who still make the final, critical decisions. This is a key distinction for scoping AI products.

The ultimate goal isn't just modeling specific systems (like protein folding), but automating the entire scientific method. This involves AI generating hypotheses, choosing experiments, analyzing results, and updating a 'world model' of a domain, creating a continuous loop of discovery.

AI's role in bioprocessing is not to replace scientists but to augment their abilities. It serves as a powerful tool providing predictive insights and autonomous optimizations. The ideal future is a partnership where humans guide strategy and interpret results, while AI handles the complex data analysis to make processes faster and more reliable.