Inspired by Satoshi, decentralized finance protocol Hyperliquid intentionally avoided VC funding to preserve its 'credible neutrality.' The team believes that any early-stage insider investment creates a permanent 'scar' on a protocol's genesis, undermining the long-term, impartial trust required for a platform intended to house global finance. This principle was deemed more important than rapid, VC-fueled growth.

Related Insights

Private equity and venture capital funds create an illusion of stability by avoiding daily mark-to-market pricing. This "laundering of volatility" is a core reason companies stay private longer. It reveals a key, if artificial, benefit of private markets that new technologies like tokenization could disrupt.

Institutions define "institutional-grade" as having human safety nets, negotiating leverage, and someone to call. This directly contradicts the core crypto ethos of removing human intermediaries and soft power, creating an ironic tension for crypto protocols seeking institutional adoption.

Instead of funding another stablecoin protocol, the more viable investment is in the tooling layer. This includes payment systems, SDKs, and accounting software (like triple-entry bookkeeping) that enable small businesses globally to integrate stablecoin payments into their existing fiat workflows.

While the early crypto market was dominated by cypherpunks advocating for anonymity, Coinbase took the opposite approach. They worked with banks and implemented KYC, betting that mainstream adoption required a compliant, trusted platform, even though it alienated the initial user base.

To maintain product focus and avoid the 'raising money game,' the founders of Cues established a separate trading company. They used the profits from this successful venture to self-fund their AI startup, enabling them to build patiently without being beholden to VC timelines or expectations.

A16Z's crypto fund prioritizes founders who have spent their careers deeply immersed in a specific sub-industry, even if it's outside crypto. This deep understanding of a problem set, like traditional finance rails or restaurant tech, is a crucial ingredient for success when applying blockchain solutions.

Despite a $50 million exit from their previous company, the Everflow founders intentionally limited their initial investment to a few hundred thousand dollars and didn't take salaries for two years. They believed capital scarcity forces focus and efficiency, preventing wasteful spending while they were still figuring out the product.

Venture capital can create a "treadmill" of raising rounds based on specific metrics, not building a sustainable business. Avoiding VC funding allowed Donald Spann to maintain control, focus on long-term viability, and build a company he could sustain without external pressures or risks.

Beyond technical features, Ethereum's core value is its "credible neutrality." The protocol doesn't favor any single user, allowing a Nigerian remittance app to have the same infrastructure access as JP Morgan. This fundamental fairness drives its network effect and widespread adoption.

Small, dedicated venture funds compete against large, price-insensitive firms by sourcing founders *before* they become mainstream. They find an edge in niche, high-signal communities like the Thiel Fellowship interviewing committee or curated groups of technical talent. This allows them to identify and invest in elite founders at inception, avoiding bidding wars and market noise.