The American housing market is increasingly inaccessible to younger generations. The median age of a homebuyer has hit a record high of 59, the same age one can access retirement funds. Even the median first-time buyer is now 40, indicating a systemic affordability crisis.
Related Insights
Meaningful affordability cannot be achieved with superficial fixes. It requires long-term, structural solutions: building 5-10 million more homes to address housing costs (40% of CPI), implementing universal healthcare to lower medical expenses, expanding public higher education, and aggressive antitrust enforcement to foster competition.
Young people feel a sense of betrayal after following the prescribed path—good grades, college—only to graduate with immense debt into a job market with few opportunities and an unaffordable housing market. This broken promise fuels their economic anxiety.
The cultural pressure to own a home can be financially crippling for young professionals. It drains liquid assets for a down payment, reduces career flexibility, and can lock individuals into jobs they hate simply to cover the mortgage. Renting provides more career agility.
Housing scarcity is a bottom-up cycle where homeowners' financial incentive is to protect their property value (NIMBYism). They then vote for politicians who enact restrictive building policies, turning personal financial interests into systemic regulatory bottlenecks.
Despite economic pressures, Millennials and Gen Z still desire traditional success milestones like homeownership. The key difference is that the path is no longer linear and the timeline has shifted. Financial planners must adapt their advice to this new, less predictable journey.
The affordability crisis isn't solely about price inflation; it's also driven by "cultural inflation." The expected size of a starter home has ballooned from under 1,000 sq ft in the 1950s to nearly 2,500 sq ft today. This dramatic shift in consumer expectations fundamentally alters the affordability calculation.
A significant cause of today's housing inventory shortage is that homeowners are locked into low-interest mortgages. "Portable mortgages," which are being actively evaluated by the FHFA, would allow homeowners to transfer their existing mortgage to a new property, removing the financial disincentive to move and potentially unlocking market liquidity.
Unlike previous generations engaged in culture wars, Gen Z's primary political motivation is economic stability. They are less interested in ideological battles and more focused on tangible issues like homeownership, affordability, and securing a financial future.
Extending mortgage terms doesn't solve housing affordability because it primarily boosts demand for a fixed supply of homes. This drives asset prices higher, as sellers adjust prices to match buyers' new monthly payment capacity. The historical example of Japan's housing bubble, fueled by 100-year mortgages, illustrates this danger.
Broad, non-means-tested stimulus programs, like the COVID CARES Act, function as the greatest intergenerational theft in history. They overwhelmingly benefit asset-owning incumbents by inflating housing and stock prices, while burdening younger generations with the debt used to finance the bailouts, effectively locking them out of asset ownership.
