We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
Applying a traditional reseller model to MSPs fails because their economics differ. MSPs need predictable, aggregated volume-based pricing to operate with agility, rather than fluctuating per-deal costs. A fit-for-purpose program must also redesign support, billing, and legal frameworks around the MSP's business model.
The traditional reseller model is a transactional, price-driven game with low loyalty. MSPs shift the dynamic by selling an ongoing outcome, like "managed privilege access." This requires continuous delivery and accountability, embedding the MSP in the customer's operations and fostering a value-based relationship.
Big box resellers often act as order takers, fulfilling what the end-user requests from a broad portfolio. In contrast, Managed Service Providers (MSPs) are more decisive, curating a specific tech stack and wrapping their own services around it to create a cohesive solution for their clients.
To grow beyond common revenue plateaus, MSPs must shift focus from their technology stack—which customers don't care about—to professional and managed services. Growth and margin come from selling solutions like managed cybersecurity or AI deployments, not from the specific tools used to deliver them.
The traditional MSP 2.0 model of reselling software seats is no longer profitable. The next evolution, MSP 3.0 or "BSP" (Business Solutions Provider), focuses on consulting and managed services to solve core business problems, shifting the revenue source from software margins to service-based value.
The financial incentive for resellers to transition to a Managed Service Provider (MSP) model is stark. Top MSPs operate at 50-60% margins, a completely different league from the 8-20% margins typical for project-based resellers, which often yield only 1-3% EBITDA.
Traditional revenue tiers (Gold, Silver, Bronze) are vendor-centric. A more effective approach is to classify partners by their business model. For example, an MSSP needs predictable upfront costs to build a service, while a value-added reseller may prefer volume-based rebates. Tailoring your program to their model, not just their size, is key.
Vendors and TSDs get lost in partner labels. The critical distinction is the partner's business model: Do they want a residual commission, to resell on their own paper, or a one-time payment? Offering this flexibility is key to recruiting and enabling modern partners.
For owners planning a future exit, the MSP model is far superior to a reseller's project-to-project structure. The stable, predictable monthly recurring revenue (MRR) from multi-year contracts is highly attractive to investors, creating a sellable asset independent of the owner's sales prowess.
MSPs operate on thin margins and need solutions that improve their bottom line and increase their company's sale value. Instead of leading with tech specs, vendors should focus on how their partnership boosts Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) and EBITDA, which directly multiplies an MSP's valuation.
To successfully sell complex solutions like process automation and AI, resellers must first apply these principles internally. By re-engineering their own business to an MSP model, they gain the experience and credibility needed to guide clients through a similar journey, moving from vendor to trusted advisor.