After running a bootstrapped business, De Soi's CEO brought a frugal mindset that was initially helpful. However, this frugality became a liability, leading her team to consistently underspend their marketing budget. She had to retrain them to see spending the full budget as a necessary KPI for growth, not a failure.
More capital isn't always better. An excess of funding can lead to a lack of focus, wasteful spending, and a reluctance to make tough choices—a form of moral hazard. It's crucial to match the amount of capital to a founder's ability to deploy it effectively without losing discipline.
After nearly failing, OpenGov adopted a frugal culture and discovered it grew faster. Less spending reduces system noise and inefficiency. A leaner, more focused sales team, for instance, can become more motivated and effective, leading to better results.
Many founders run "too lean," maximizing short-term profit at the expense of long-term growth. Strategically investing in a team, even if it lowers margins temporarily, frees the founder to focus on scaling, leading to greater overall profitability and less burnout.
David Cohen observes that founders who are inherently frugal or "stingy" with capital—spending only when absolutely necessary—often achieve better outcomes. This mindset, focused on capital preservation and efficiency, is a more powerful indicator of success than simply raising large rounds to fuel growth, a trait he has seen in his own entrepreneurial career.
Founder Harris Kenney cut his personal pay to hire a sales coach, aiming to preserve runway. He found this created resentment and pressure, 'tainting' his mindset and making it harder to benefit from the coaching. This highlights the hidden psychological cost of such financial sacrifices.
A frequent conflict arises between cautious VCs who advise raising excess capital and optimistic founders who underestimate their needs. This misalignment often leads to companies running out of money, a preventable failure mode that veteran VCs have seen repeat for decades, especially when capital is tight.
Bootstrapping is often a capital constraint that limits a founder's full potential. Conversely, venture capital removes this constraint, acting as a forcing function that immediately reveals a founder's true capabilities in recruiting, product, and fundraising. It's the equivalent of 'going pro' by facing the raw question: 'How good am I?'
Even when a business has a clear, cash-flow positive acquisition model (e.g., spending $150 to make $500+ in 30 days), the owner's fear and "defensive mindset" can prevent scaling. This psychological barrier is often the true bottleneck to growth, not a lack of funds.
The most impactful marketers adopt a founder's mindset by constantly asking if their decisions align with the CEO or CFO's perspective on profitable growth. This leads to creating "boring" — repeatable and consistent — systems, rather than chasing new, shiny projects every quarter.
Emma Hernan, who bootstrapped her company, observed funded competitors fail by spending investor money carelessly. Her advice to funded founders is to adopt a bootstrapped mentality, treating every external dollar with the same discipline as if it were their last personal dollar to ensure prudent capital allocation.