A new category of cloud providers, "NeoClouds," are built specifically for high-performance GPU workloads. Unlike traditional clouds like AWS, which were retrofitted from a CPU-centric architecture, NeoClouds offer superior performance for AI tasks by design and through direct collaboration with hardware vendors like NVIDIA.
Related Insights
As chip manufacturers like NVIDIA release new hardware, inference providers like Base10 absorb the complexity and engineering effort required to optimize AI models for the new chips. This service is a key value proposition, saving customers from the challenging process of re-optimizing workloads for new hardware.
The merger combines Lightning AI's software suite with Voltage Park's GPU infrastructure. This vertical integration provides a seamless, cost-effective solution for AI development, from training to deployment, much like Apple controls its hardware and software for a superior user experience.
The primary bear case for specialized neoclouds like CoreWeave isn't just competition from AWS or Google. A more fundamental risk is a breakthrough in GPU efficiency that commoditizes deployment, diminishing the value of the neoclouds' core competency in complex, optimized racking and setup.
Nvidia dominates AI because its GPU architecture was perfect for the new, highly parallel workload of AI training. Market leadership isn't just about having the best chip, but about having the right architecture at the moment a new dominant computing task emerges.
A fundamental shift is occurring where startups allocate limited budgets toward specialized AI models and developer tools, rather than defaulting to AWS for all infrastructure. This signals a de-bundling of the traditional cloud stack and a change in platform priorities.
CoreWeave argues that large tech companies aren't just using them to de-risk massive capital outlays. Instead, they are buying a superior, purpose-built product. CoreWeave’s infrastructure is optimized from the ground up for parallelized AI workloads, a fundamental shift from traditional cloud architecture.
AI networking is not an evolution of cloud networking but a new paradigm. It's a 'back-end' system designed to connect thousands of GPUs, handling traffic with far greater intensity, durability, and burstiness than the 'front-end' networks serving general-purpose cloud workloads, requiring different metrics and parameters.
The intense power demands of AI inference will push data centers to adopt the "heterogeneous compute" model from mobile phones. Instead of a single GPU architecture, data centers will use disaggregated, specialized chips for different tasks to maximize power efficiency, creating a post-GPU era.
GPUs were designed for graphics, not AI. It was a "twist of fate" that their massively parallel architecture suited AI workloads. Chips designed from scratch for AI would be much more efficient, opening the door for new startups to build better, more specialized hardware and challenge incumbents.
Nvidia retreated from building its own cloud service due to the difficulty and unreliability of its 'cloud of clouds' model, which leased competitor infrastructure. It has now pivoted to a less complex marketplace model, connecting customers to smaller cloud providers instead.