America's competitive AI advantage over China is not uniform. While the lead in AI models is narrow (approx. 6 months), it widens significantly at lower levels of the tech stack—to about two years for chips and as much as five years for the critical semiconductor manufacturing equipment.
Related Insights
The performance gap between US and Chinese AI models may be widening due to second-order effects of chip controls. By limiting inference at scale, the controls reduce the volume of customer interactions and feedback Chinese firms receive. This starves them of the data needed to identify and patch model weaknesses on diverse, real-world tasks.
A nation's advantage is its "intelligent capital stock": its total GPU compute power multiplied by the quality of its AI models. This explains the US restricting GPU sales to China, which counters by excelling in open-source models to close the gap.
Contrary to the narrative of a close race, Huawei's AI chips are falling further behind NVIDIA's. The performance gap is projected to widen from a 5x difference to a 17x difference within two years. Shockingly, Huawei's next-generation chip is actually projected to be less powerful than its current leading model, indicating significant production struggles.
Contrary to the narrative of a simple "tech race," the assessment is that China is already ahead in physical AI and supply chain capabilities. The expert warns that this gap is not only expected to last three to five years but may widen at an accelerating rate, posing a significant long-term competitive challenge for the U.S.
The US-China tech rivalry spans four arenas: creating technology, applying it, installing infrastructure, and self-sufficiency. While the U.S. excels at creating foundational tech like AI frameworks and semiconductors, China is leading in its practical application (e.g., robotics), installing digital infrastructure globally, and achieving resource independence.
The US is betting on winning the AI race by building the smartest models. However, China has strategically mastered the entire "electric stack"—energy generation, batteries, grids, and manufacturing. Beijing offers the world the 21st-century infrastructure needed to power AI, while Washington focuses on 20th-century energy sources.
China's semiconductor strategy is not merely to reverse-engineer Western technology like ASML's. It's a well-funded "primacy race" to develop novel, AI-driven lithography systems. This approach aims to create superior, not just parallel, manufacturing capabilities to gain global economic leverage.
China is compensating for its deficit in cutting-edge semiconductors by pursuing an asymmetric strategy. It focuses on massive 'superclusters' of less advanced domestic chips and creating hyper-efficient, open-source AI models. This approach prioritizes widespread, low-cost adoption over chasing the absolute peak of performance like the US.
The US-China AI race is a 'game of inches.' While America leads in conceptual breakthroughs, China excels at rapid implementation and scaling. This dynamic reduces any American advantage to a matter of months, requiring constant, fast-paced innovation to maintain leadership.
While the West may lead in AI models, China's key strategic advantage is its ability to 'embody' AI in hardware. Decades of de-industrialization in the U.S. have left a gap, while China's manufacturing dominance allows it to integrate AI into cars, drones, and robots at a scale the West cannot currently match.