Trials like the dostarlimab study in rectal cancer and NICHE in colon cancer show neoadjuvant immunotherapy can induce profound responses in MSI-high tumors. This is creating a new paradigm where major surgery might be avoided entirely for some patients, marking a significant shift in treatment strategy.

In a study of neoadjuvant Dostarlamab for MSI-high tumors, 100% of rectal cancer patients achieved a clinical complete response, compared to 82% of colon cancer patients. Experts find this high degree of discordance surprising and currently lack a clear biological explanation, as such differences are not typically observed in the metastatic setting.

Following positive Phase III data for adjuvant atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in Stage III MSI-high colon cancer, clinicians are extrapolating this approach to high-risk Stage II patients. For some, they favor using immunotherapy alone, omitting chemotherapy due to its perceived limited additional benefit in the Stage II setting.

Experts favor a Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab (NIVO+EP) combination for newly diagnosed, MSI-high, stage IV gastroesophageal cancer patients who can tolerate it. This approach avoids chemotherapy and yields high, sustained response rates, including potential for complete pathologic responses in metastatic settings.

While the ATOMIC trial established FOLFOX plus atezolizumab as a new standard for adjuvant therapy in MSI-high colon cancer, its design lacked an immunotherapy-only arm. This leaves a critical, unanswered question about the actual contribution and necessity of the chemotherapy component.

Despite a study showing a minor hazard ratio benefit for a FLOT-like regimen over FOLFOX in the metastatic setting, experts advise against it. The significant increase in toxicity outweighs the small efficacy advantage, especially in symptomatic metastatic patients who are often nutritionally deficient and less able to tolerate aggressive chemotherapy.

Retrospective data suggests patients with MSI-high rectal cancer might not just respond poorly to standard neoadjuvant chemoradiation (TNT), but their disease could actually progress. This makes immunotherapy a potentially safer and more effective first-line neoadjuvant choice, not just an alternative.

The COMET study found combining chemotherapy with atezolizumab did not improve overall survival versus atezolizumab alone. However, it nearly eliminated early progressive disease (2.8% vs. 32.4%), suggesting a critical role for patients with high tumor burden who cannot risk initial progression on monotherapy.

For fit patients with metastatic MSI-high colorectal cancer, the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab is the preferred frontline treatment over pembrolizumab monotherapy. This is based on Phase III data showing the dual IO approach is superior. Single-agent PD-1 inhibitors are reserved for frail patients or those with autoimmune comorbidities.