Silicon Valley's default response to crazy ideas is curiosity, not cynicism, which fosters greater ambition. Crucially, the culture values the experience gained from failure. A founder who raised and lost $50 million is still seen as a valuable bet by investors, a dynamic not found in other ecosystems.

Focusing only on trendy sectors leads to intense competition where the vast majority of startups fail. True opportunity lies in contrarian ideas that others overlook or dismiss, as these markets have fewer competitors.

Conventional wisdom that early-stage startups must "grind" is flawed. The primary constraint is a lack of unique insight to find product-market fit, not a lack of hours worked. A relentless "996" culture can be counterproductive, as it leaves no room for the deep thinking and creativity needed for breakthrough ideas.

Corporate creativity follows a bell curve. Early-stage companies and those facing catastrophic failure (the tails) are forced to innovate. Most established companies exist in the middle, where repeating proven playbooks and playing it safe stifles true risk-taking.

Oshkosh structures partnerships to own IP developed jointly with a startup, then licenses it back. This approach, outlined in the initial NDA, gives the large corporation control over patent defense while providing the startup with usage rights, often with market-specific limitations.

Holding a patent provides no inherent protection. Its value is only realized through active, and expensive, legal defense against infringers. Therefore, a startup's focus should be on building a profitable business first to generate the capital needed to enforce its IP.

Reframe IP from a legal asset to be protected into your 'intellectual perspective'—a unique viewpoint on how to do something. This mindset shifts focus from costly legal protection to creating shareable, repeatable frameworks that scale your business beyond your personal involvement.