For trillion-dollar private companies like SpaceX going public, the traditional 90-180 day lockup period is inadequate. The massive volume of insider shares hitting the market at once could crash the stock. Investment bankers are now designing staggered lockup releases to manage this unprecedented liquidity event.
Related Insights
Similar to the short-lived direct listing wave, the idea of staying private indefinitely will likely only apply to a handful of elite, capital-rich companies like SpaceX. The vast majority of successful startups will still follow the traditional IPO path to provide liquidity and access public markets.
SpaceX's dominant position can be framed for an IPO not as a player in terrestrial industries, but as the owner of 90% of the entire universe's launch capabilities. This narrative positions it as controlling the infrastructure for all future off-planet economies, from connectivity to defense, dwarfing Earth-bound tech giants.
The default VC practice of distributing shares after an IPO lockup can leave massive gains on the table. Missing a multi-billion dollar run-up suggests a more nuanced, case-by-case discussion with LPs is needed, as holding can be the difference between a 5x and a 15x fund.
The paper wealth generated on IPO day is a misleading metric due to lockup periods and market volatility. A more accurate mental model for an investor's actual return is the company's market capitalization 18 months after the public offering. This timeframe provides a truer 'locked in value' after initial hype and selling pressure subsides.
The standard VC practice of distributing shares to LPs immediately after a lockup expires can be a multi-billion dollar error. The case of selling Reddit at a $9B valuation, only to see it rise much higher, highlights that VCs may need to evolve into holding public positions longer, challenging the traditional model.
SpaceX is reportedly targeting a $1.5 trillion IPO to raise $30 billion. This capital isn't just for rockets but to fund a new AI infrastructure business: data centers in space. This represents a significant strategic shift, leveraging its launch dominance to compete in the AI compute market by acquiring massive quantities of GPUs.
An IPO is not a final exit but the start of a public "marriage" with new responsibilities. This mindset shifts focus from the event itself to rigorously preparing the company for the long-term demands of public markets, for instance through simulated earnings calls and disciplined share allocation to long-term investors.
A theory posits that SpaceX's massive potential IPO is a "spite IPO" by Elon Musk. By raising tens of billions in the public market, he could "suck the oxygen out of the room," making it significantly harder for capital-intensive AI competitors like OpenAI and Anthropic to secure their own large funding rounds.
The futuristic idea of space-based data centers is framed not as an immediate technical plan but as a powerful narrative for a potential SpaceX IPO. This story creates an immense, futuristic total addressable market required to justify a multi-trillion-dollar valuation, a classic Musk strategy for attracting public market capital.
By staying private longer, elite companies like SpaceX allow venture and growth funds to capture compounding returns previously reserved for public markets. This extended "growth super cycle" has become the most profitable strategy for late-stage private investors.
