While many individual contributor PMs thrive on being scrappy and avoiding rigid process, a director's effectiveness is measured by their ability to create scalable systems and consistent practices. Overcoming an "allergy to process" is a mandatory step in the transition to a leadership role.

Related Insights

Product management is inherently chaotic due to constant context switching, ambiguity, and difficult stakeholder conversations. Success isn't about finding a perfect process, but developing the resilience to navigate this mess and guide teams from ambiguity to clarity.

The product management role exists on a spectrum between building and bureaucracy. The profession has now skewed heavily toward the bureaucratic end, focusing more on process, frameworks, and coordination than on the creative act of building valuable products, losing its original "magic."

As companies grow, collaboration and culture don't scale as quickly as headcount. To maintain product excellence, organizations need dedicated roles like Product Operations to act as "the product manager of the org itself," intentionally designing and improving ways of working.

The core job of a Product Manager is not writing specs or talking to press; it's a leadership role. Success means getting a product to market that wins. This requires influencing engineering, marketing, and sales without any formal authority, making it the ultimate training ground for real leadership.

In today's fast-paced tech landscape, especially in AI, there is no room for leaders who only manage people. Every manager, up to the CPO, must be a "builder" capable of diving into the details—whether adjusting copy or pushing pixels—to effectively guide their teams.

Pendo's CPO warns that scaling isn't just about replicating processes for more teams. Leaders must simultaneously build coordination systems (design reviews, clear communication) while fighting to maintain the "maniacal focus on the customer" and rapid innovation that characterize small teams.

Product leaders often try to implement agile best practices within their team, but fail because the surrounding organization still operates on a project-based model. The rest of the company treats the product team like a feature factory, handing over requests and demanding deadlines, creating immense internal friction.

A simple mental model to distinguish between a Product Manager and a Director is altitude and time horizon. PMs operate at a low altitude (tactical, user-focused) with a short horizon (sprints, weeks). Directors operate at a high altitude (strategic, portfolio-level) with a long horizon (quarters, years).

Unlike PMs, directors make objective, portfolio-wide decisions, which may include defunding or shelving a product. A critical mental shift for aspiring directors is to stop tying personal and professional value to the success of one product and instead focus on the overall health of the business.

A fundamental shift from PM to Director is where you derive professional satisfaction. As a PM, joy often comes from shipping products and solving user problems. As a Director, your primary source of joy must come from seeing your team members succeed, grow, and have an impact.