Instead of a traditional chemotherapy comparison, Divarasib's registrational study is a head-to-head trial against approved KRAS G12C inhibitors. This trial design reflects a strategic shift towards proving superiority within a new drug class, not just efficacy against older standards of care.

Direxonrasib is showing unprecedented response rates (e.g., 47% in frontline) for metastatic pancreatic cancer, a historically difficult-to-treat disease. This high performance prompts comparisons to the targeted therapy successes seen in lung cancer, signaling a potential paradigm shift in treatment expectations for PDAC.

The KRAS G12D mutation, unlike the more common G12C, often occurs in younger, never-smoking lung cancer patients who previously lacked targeted therapy options. The high response rate (61%) and good tolerability of the G12D inhibitor Zoldanrasib could fill a significant unmet need in this specific demographic.

The enzalutamide arms saw discontinuation rates of 20-25% due to adverse events. This high rate reflects a different risk calculation for patients who feel healthy and are asymptomatic. Unlike in advanced disease where patients tolerate more toxicity, this population has a very low threshold for side effects, making early intervention a significant trade-off.

Perioperative enfortumab vedotin-pembrolizumab (EV-Pembro) is surprisingly well-tolerated on a per-cycle basis compared to the traditional GEMSYS chemotherapy regimen. This challenges preconceived notions about the toxicity of this powerful combination, though cumulative toxicity over longer durations remains a key factor.

The TRILINX trial revealed Xevinapant's toxicity was so high that it forced reductions in standard, effective treatments like cisplatin and radiation. This compromised the foundational therapy, leading to worse patient outcomes and demonstrating a key risk in adding novel agents to established regimens.

Despite showing massive weight loss, new obesity drugs from Eli Lilly and others have high discontinuation rates due to side effects. This suggests the industry's singular focus on efficacy may be hitting diminishing returns, opening a new competitive front based on better patient tolerance and adherence.

The development of new KIT inhibitors like bezuclastinib is largely fueled by the need for alternatives to high-dose avapritinib in advanced SM. Concerns about cognitive effects and rare intracranial hemorrhage with avapritinib create an opportunity for agents with less blood-brain barrier penetration.

With efficacy and toxicity profiles being nearly identical between the first approved KRAS G12C inhibitors, intracranial activity becomes a key differentiator for clinicians, especially since a third of these lung cancer patients develop brain metastases. Adagrasib's demonstrated CNS activity gives it a slight advantage.