The control arm in the EMBARK study was blinded to PSA results, preventing physicians from intervening with standard-of-care AR antagonists at PSA progression. This design likely delayed subsequent effective therapies, making the control arm underperform and potentially exaggerating the overall survival benefit of the experimental arms.
To determine if fatigue or cognitive dysfunction is caused by enzalutamide, a clinician suggests a practical approach called the "Stevens Maneuver." The patient stops the drug for two weeks. If symptoms don't improve, the cause is likely something else. If they do improve, the drug is the culprit, and it can often be resumed at a lower dose.
An NCI working group coined "PSMA positive BCR" to classify patients with biochemical relapse (BCR) who have findings on a modern PSMA PET scan. This formally recognizes this group is distinct from both conventionally-defined metastatic patients and traditional BCR patients, necessitating unique clinical trial designs and treatment strategies.
The EMBARK trial demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit, yet experts argue this doesn't automatically make treatment mandatory. For asymptomatic patients with a long life expectancy, factors like treatment-free survival and quality of life are critical considerations, challenging the primacy of OS as the sole decision-driver in this population.
The EMBARK trial showed that enzalutamide monotherapy was superior to standard ADT monotherapy for metastasis-free survival. This suggests potent AR antagonism may be a more effective strategy than simply depleting the testosterone ligand, challenging the long-held dogma of ADT being the fundamental building block for systemic prostate cancer therapy.
The advent of highly sensitive PSMA PET imaging identifies metastases in many patients previously considered to have only biochemical relapse (BCR). However, experts argue against a knee-jerk reaction to treat. Many of these patients, particularly those with slow PSA doubling times, can be safely observed, challenging the assumption that visible disease always requires immediate intervention.
The enzalutamide arms saw discontinuation rates of 20-25% due to adverse events. This high rate reflects a different risk calculation for patients who feel healthy and are asymptomatic. Unlike in advanced disease where patients tolerate more toxicity, this population has a very low threshold for side effects, making early intervention a significant trade-off.