Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian frames his investment in collectibles like luxury watches as a pro-AI bet, not an anti-AI one. His thesis is that as AI automates digital and mass-produced goods, the value of scarce, human-made items embodying exceptional craftsmanship will rise significantly.

Related Insights

Jim VandeHei predicts that as AI makes general information free and ubiquitous, the market value of distinctive, human-driven expertise will soar. Media companies with deep, niche reporting will thrive, while those producing generic content that can be easily replicated by AI will fail.

Endeavor CEO Ari Emanuel calls his focus on live events "the opposite of an AI bet." The logic is that as AI makes digital content abundant, the scarcity and value of real-world, in-person human experiences will skyrocket. This is a powerful counter-narrative that leverages the AI trend to its advantage.

As AI drives the marginal cost of digital content to zero, unique, in-person events become increasingly valuable. This is a strategic bet on the enduring human need for social connection and status, which cannot be digitally replicated. Value shifts from the digital to the physical.

When AI handles material needs, the traditional status game of wealth accumulation will lose its meaning. Humans will instead compete for status in non-productive domains like athletics, video games, or curating collections. These niche communities will become the new arenas for finding meaning and social hierarchy.

As AI drives the cost of content creation to zero, the world floods with 'average' material. In this environment, the most valuable and scarce skill becomes 'taste'—the ability to identify, curate, and champion high-quality, commercially viable work. This elevates the role of human curators over pure creators.

As AI commoditizes execution and intellectual labor, the only remaining scarce human skill will be judgment: the wisdom to know what to build, why, and for whom. This shifts economic value from effort and hard work to discernment and taste.

AI tools are dramatically lowering the cost of implementation and "rote building." The value shifts, making the most expensive and critical part of product creation the design phase: deeply understanding the user pain point, exercising good judgment, and having product taste.

Even if AI can perfectly replicate all goods and services, human desire for authenticity, connection, and imperfection will create a premium for human-provided labor. This suggests new economies will emerge based not on efficiency, but on providing what is uniquely and quirkily human.

As AI-generated content becomes ubiquitous, a counter-movement will establish "100% human-generated" as a premium, luxury status symbol. This "artisanal anti-AI" trend will manifest as certifications and exclusive networks, appealing to consumers who value authenticity and human craftsmanship.

As AI makes it incredibly easy to build products, the market will be flooded with options. The critical, differentiating skill will no longer be technical execution but human judgment: deciding *what* should exist, which features matter, and the right distribution strategy. Synthesizing these elements is where future value lies.