Sales compensation is the most powerful lever for changing a sales team's behavior quickly. More than training or directives, incentives tell reps what they are supposed to do and why, directly shaping their daily actions and strategic focus.
Drawing on Charlie Munger's wisdom, investment management problems often stem from misaligned incentives. Instead of trying to change people's actions directly, leaders should redesign the incentive structure. Rational individuals will naturally align their behavior with well-constructed incentives that drive desired client outcomes.
In a project-based company, salespeople are heroes for closing large, complex, custom projects. This incentive structure is directly opposed to a product model that requires standardization. The transition to product will fail unless sales compensation and culture are realigned to favor standard product sales.
Delaying compensation plans until after the fiscal year begins creates a vacuum where salespeople are unsure how to behave. This uncertainty paralyzes productivity and demotivates the team, wasting the energy generated by the sales kickoff (SKO).
A one-size-fits-all sales role fails in consumption models. Success requires segmenting the team into specialized roles—new business acquisition, customer onboarding, and account management—each with distinct incentives aligned to their specific function, from initial sign-up to value realization and expansion.
While bonuses tied to revenue incentivize employees to perform specific tasks, they are purely transactional. Granting stock options makes team members think holistically about the entire business's long-term health, from strategic opportunities to small cost savings, creating true psychological ownership.
Don't finalize a comp plan in an executive silo. Share the draft with trusted, top-performing reps and ask them to break it. They will immediately spot loopholes and unintended incentives, allowing you to create a more robust plan that drives the right behaviors from day one.
Salespeople's biggest frustration with comp plans is being held accountable for outcomes they can't directly influence. This perceived unfairness is a primary driver of attrition, making it critical to align incentives strictly with a seller's direct responsibilities and control.
Instead of treating high commission payouts as a pure expense, view them as a marketing asset. Actively ensuring it's known that top reps make a lot of money serves as the best possible recruiting tool, attracting other A-players to your company.
Annual plans can't predict every business need, like a new product launch or acquisition. A pre-approved budget for discretionary incentives (SPIFs) allows sales leaders to quickly motivate reps toward new, unforeseen priorities without having to disrupt the core compensation plan mid-year.
To handle 'bluebird' deals without demotivating reps, avoid hard caps. Instead, implement a policy where commissions exceeding a high threshold (e.g., 400% of variable pay) are 'subject to review.' This protects the company from unearned windfalls while maintaining unlimited potential for legitimate efforts.