In rapidly changing industries, a standalone M&A strategy is insufficient. Combine it with a corporate venture capital (CVC) program to evaluate whether to acquire current technology or make smaller investments in emerging, potentially disruptive companies, providing valuable market intelligence for future M&A decisions.

Related Insights

A robust M&A strategy isn't built in a vacuum. Snowflake's CorpDev team continuously gathers intelligence from three sources: VCs (capital flow), entrepreneurs (innovation), and internal product leaders (strategic needs). This triangulation allows them to form a holistic and actionable market view.

Combining strategy, M&A, and integration under a single leader provides a full lifecycle, enterprise-wide view. This structure breaks down silos and creates a "closed-loop system" where post-deal integration performance and lessons learned directly feed back into future strategy and deal theses, refining success metrics beyond financials.

Oshkosh's CVC team is a hybrid, not siloed in one department. It includes members from corporate development, a venture lead in a tech hub (Bay Area), and a counterpart in an engineering business unit. This structure ensures that strategic goals, technological feasibility, and market deal flow are constantly aligned.

The rapid evolution of AI means traditional private equity M&A timelines are too slow. PE firms and their portfolio companies must now behave more like venture capitalists, acquiring earlier-stage, riskier AI companies to secure necessary technology before it becomes unaffordable or obsolete.

Many M&A teams focus solely on closing the deal, a critical execution task. The best acquirers succeed by designing a parallel process where integration planning and value creation strategies are developed simultaneously with due diligence, ensuring post-close success.

When acquiring a business, don't rely on a single outcome like achieving a growth target. Instead, seek assets that offer multiple ways to win. Even if the primary goal is missed, the acquired data, technology, or talent could create significant value for other business units, providing built-in insurance for the deal.

Instead of a linear process, treat M&A as a spiral. Constantly revisit and adjust deal structure, diligence findings, and integration plans. A discovery in one area (e.g., diligence) should trigger a reassessment of the others (e.g., deal structure), ensuring a cohesive and de-risked outcome.

In a fast-moving field like cybersecurity, it's impossible to build everything in-house. By treating M&A as an extension of the R&D department, a large company can leverage the venture-backed ecosystem to acquire innovative teams and products that are already validated.

Oshkosh evolved its corporate venture capital from focusing on financial returns to prioritizing strategic innovation. This "CVC 2.0" approach emphasizes direct partnerships and technology integration to supplement in-house R&D, making innovation the primary goal, though financial returns are still a factor.

Instead of jumping directly to an acquisition, de-risk the process by first establishing a partnership or licensing agreement. This allows you to test the technology, cultural fit, and market reception with a lower commitment, building a stronger foundation for a potential future deal.