In venture capital, mid-sized generalist funds struggle to compete. They lack the scale and network of large generalists and the deep expertise of small specialists. This 'death of the middle' makes it difficult for them to win the best, most competitive deals against firms that can offer either breadth or depth.
Related Insights
The private markets industry is bifurcating. General Partners (GPs) must either scale massively with broad distribution to sell multiple products, or focus on a highly differentiated, unique strategy. The middle ground—being a mid-sized, undifferentiated firm—is becoming the most difficult position to defend.
A16Z's transformation from a small, generalist partnership to a large, specialized firm was a deliberate answer to a fundamental industry problem: the traditional partner model doesn't scale for deploying capital and making decisions in today's massive, professionalized venture market.
Applying Conway's Law to venture, a firm's strategy is dictated by its fund size and team structure. A $7B fund must participate in mega-rounds to deploy capital effectively, while a smaller fund like Benchmark is structured to pursue astronomical money-on-money returns from earlier stages, making mega-deals strategically illogical.
VC funds between $50M and a few hundred million can be a 'dead zone' for general partners. They are too large to benefit from the quick-carry potential of small funds but too small to generate significant management fees like mega-funds, making the personal economics challenging for managers.
Contrary to conventional wisdom, deep sector expertise can be a liability in venture capital. VC firm Felicis found that none of its 53 unicorn investments were led by an expert in that specific sector. Experts can be anchored to orthodox thinking, while generalists are better able to recognize and back disruptive, first-principles approaches.
The days of the successful private equity generalist are over. Limited Partners (LPs) now demand deep, specific expertise. A firm claiming to specialize in multiple, disparate sectors is seen as lacking true differentiation and focus—a strategy that may have worked a decade ago but fails in today's competitive market.
Resist the common trend of chasing popular deals. Instead, invest years in deeply understanding a specific, narrow sector. This specialized expertise allows you to make smarter investment decisions, add unique value to companies, and potentially secure better deal pricing when opportunities eventually arise.
In private equity, capital is the ultimate commodity. The most effective way to differentiate is through deep, singular industry specialization. This expertise generates inbound deal flow, allows for unique value-add post-acquisition, and creates a memorable brand that resonates with sellers.
The venture capital landscape is bifurcating. Large, multi-stage funds leverage scale and network, while small, boutique funds win with deep domain expertise. Mid-sized generalist funds lack a clear competitive edge and risk getting squeezed out by these two dominant models.
True alpha in venture capital is found at the extremes. It's either in being a "market maker" at the earliest stages by shaping a raw idea, or by writing massive, late-stage checks where few can compete. The competitive, crowded middle-stages offer less opportunity for outsized returns.
