Contrary to its role in lung cancer, PD-L1 expression does not predict benefit from immunotherapy in mesothelioma. Data from major trials shows similar outcomes regardless of PD-L1 status, leading clinicians to omit this test entirely and streamline treatment decisions.

The treatment landscape for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer has rapidly evolved into a biomarker-driven paradigm. Clinicians must now test for and choose between therapies targeting distinct markers like folate receptor alpha (mirvetuximab), HER2 (T-DXd), and PD-L1 (pembrolizumab), requiring a sophisticated sequencing strategy.

The B96 trial's potential approval for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer introduces a new treatment sequencing challenge. Clinicians must decide between this immunotherapy combination and the ADC mervituximab, which has a clear biomarker (foliate receptor alpha). The lack of a reliable biomarker for the B96 regimen complicates this decision-making process for patients.

Despite multiple clinical trials, adding checkpoint inhibitors to frontline therapy for ovarian cancer has not demonstrated a proven survival benefit. The role of immunotherapy in this setting remains confined to rare subsets like DMMR or TMB-high tumors, and it is not standard practice for the general population.

The AGO-OV-229 trial confirmed that adding the PD-L1 inhibitor Atezolizumab to bevacizumab and chemotherapy did not improve overall or progression-free survival, reinforcing the challenge of applying immunotherapy in this setting.

Unlike early ADCs requiring high biomarker expression (e.g., mirvetuximab), next-generation agents show efficacy even in low-expressing tumors. This allows for broader, "all-comer" clinical trial inclusion criteria instead of biomarker-gated entry, potentially expanding patient access to these novel therapies.

Although the overall trial was negative, exploratory analysis of the AGO-OV-229 study suggested patients previously treated with Bevacizumab derived more benefit from Atezolizumab, hinting at a potential synergy worth further investigation.

A PD-L1 CPS score of zero should not automatically disqualify patients with metastatic anal cancer from receiving immunotherapy. The clinical distinction between a CPS of zero and one is marginal, and given the therapy's potential for benefit and low toxicity, clinicians should give patients the benefit of the doubt and offer the treatment.

An expert argues forcefully that the PD-L1 biomarker should be "ditched" in bladder cancer. Citing its repeated failure to predict overall survival benefit across multiple major trials, it is deemed an oversimplified and unreliable tool that leads to both over- and under-treatment of patients.