A core tenet of Forrest Li's leadership is that leaders must personally own and execute the most difficult decisions, like freezing salaries. He argues that pleasant and popular tasks should be delegated, while the leader's ultimate responsibility is to show up in difficult times and make the unpopular-but-necessary calls.

Most corporate values statements (e.g., "integrity") are unactionable and don't change internal culture. Effective leaders codify specific, observable behaviors—the "how" of working together. This makes unspoken expectations explicit and creates a clear standard for accountability that a vague value never could.

Shift your mindset from feeling responsible for your employees' actions and feelings to being responsible *to* them. Fulfill your obligations of providing training, resources, and clear expectations, but empower them to own their own performance and problems.

Effective long-term leadership isn't static; it's an 'accordion' that flexes between deep involvement and granting autonomy. This adaptive approach is key for different company seasons, knowing when to lean into details and when to empower the team to make 'foot fault' mistakes and learn.

When you establish clear boundaries and accountability, employees must make a choice. They either rise to meet the new standards or they leave. This process naturally filters out underperformers and those who prefer low-accountability environments, ultimately strengthening your team.

A coaching-based leadership style is valuable for engagement but can fail in ambiguity. When a team struggles to find a "red thread" connecting their work, the leader must switch from asking questions to providing a clear, assertive frame and setting direction.

Instead of vague values, define culture as a concrete set of "if-then" statements that govern reinforcement (e.g., "IF you are on time, THEN you are respected"). This turns an abstract concept into an operational system that can be explicitly taught, managed, and improved across the organization.

As teams grow, ambiguity over ownership increases, causing key tasks to be dropped. The RACI model (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) combats this by clarifying roles upfront for any project, ensuring clear ownership and preventing the diffusion of responsibility that paralyzes larger groups.

Stop defining a manager's job by tasks like meetings or feedback. Instead, define it by the goal: getting better outcomes from a group. Your only tools to achieve this are three levers: getting the right People, defining the right Process, and aligning everyone on a clear Purpose.