The 2026 midterm elections are unlikely to cause significant policy shifts due to probable gridlock. Their real value for investors is in providing 'soft signals' about evolving voter preferences that could foreshadow major policy directions after the 2028 general election, creating opportunities if the market misinterprets them.

The sectors that outperform in the initial year of a new presidential administration can provide a roadmap for market trends over the subsequent years. This political-macro overlay suggests focusing on current leaders, like metals, for sustained performance.

An ideologically driven and inconsistent FDA is eroding investor confidence, turning the U.S. into a difficult environment for investment in complex biologics like gene therapies and vaccines, potentially pushing innovation to other countries.

Historically a Democratic focus, drug pricing policy has been co-opted by Republicans, making it a bipartisan political issue. This alignment creates a stable policy overhang and sustained uncertainty around pricing and innovation, deterring generalist investors regardless of which party is in power.

Former BLS Commissioner Erica Groshen argues the agency's automated process makes it nearly impossible to manipulate a single report. The real danger is systemic change, like converting career civil servants into political appointees who can be fired, gradually eroding the agency's culture of impartiality.

Former CDC Director Dr. Tom Frieden found he had significantly less power than when he was NYC's Health Commissioner. City-level roles can have more flexible funding and direct regulatory authority (like closing restaurants), while federal agency heads are constrained by hundreds of rigid congressional budget lines.

The US has historically benefited from a baseline level of high competence in its government officials, regardless of party. This tradition is now eroding, being replaced by a focus on loyalty over expertise. This degradation from competence to acolytes poses a significant, underrecognized threat to national stability and global standing.

The current expectation for legislative stalemate could be completely upended by a significant economic downturn. A recession would make fiscal stimulus more politically appealing to both parties, consistent with historical patterns, creating an environment for policy action that otherwise seems unlikely given the political landscape.

To improve federal efficiency beyond partisan politics, Oliver Libby proposes creating a Chief Operating Officer for the U.S. government. Modeled after the long-term, cross-administration tenure of the Fed Chair, this role would focus on making government work better for citizens regardless of who is in power.