Amadeus reinvests heavily in R&D, with a spend equivalent to its #3 competitor's total revenue. This creates a widening technology and product gap that smaller players cannot bridge, fortifying its market leadership and making it increasingly difficult for others to keep up.

While high capex is often seen as a negative, for giants like Alphabet and Microsoft, it functions as a powerful moat in the AI race. The sheer scale of spending—tens of billions annually—is something most companies cannot afford, effectively limiting the field of viable competitors.

Rockefeller identified transportation as his largest expense and made it his obsession. Instead of just minimizing this cost, he transformed it into a strategic weapon, negotiating secret rebates that not only lowered his costs but also generated profit from competitors' shipments, effectively funding his monopolistic expansion.

The moat for a market leader isn't just the initial VC investment; it's the subsequent, rapid follow-on rounds that create a 'wall of money.' This forces competitors to prove they can win against not just a brand name, but also a massive and compounding capital advantage.

Despite its near-monopoly on leading-edge chips, TSMC maintains its dominance partly by not charging exorbitant prices. This conservative, long-term strategy makes it economically unattractive for new competitors to enter the market, thus protecting TSMC's position more effectively than maximizing short-term profit would.

While low-capex businesses are easy to start, businesses requiring significant capital for equipment or technology create a financial barrier to entry. This reduces competition, allowing for more pricing power and long-term defensibility once you've achieved success.

Unlike typical asset-light software companies, Cloudflare's capital-intensive model of owning physical infrastructure is a core strategic advantage. This CapEx builds a global network that is extremely difficult for competitors to replicate, creating a durable competitive moat through owned infrastructure.

New chip fab ventures face immense hurdles because fabrication is less like following a manual and more like mastering a recipe through decades of trial and error. This accumulated, non-transferable knowledge, likened to "cooking," creates a significant moat for incumbents like TSMC.

Drawing from Verkada's decision to build its own hardware, the strategy is to intentionally tackle difficult, foundational challenges early on. While this requires more upfront investment and delays initial traction, it creates an immense competitive barrier that latecomers will struggle to overcome.