When mainstream culture refuses to offer positive frameworks for masculinity, only addressing it with negative prefixes like "toxic," it creates a vacuum. It cannot then complain when alternative, sometimes extreme, voices step in to fill that void and answer young men's need for guidance.

While mainstream liberal politics often frames young men as 'the problem,' the far right has actively courted this disenfranchised group. This political vacuum allowed extremist ideologies to fill the void, capturing a significant and politically potent demographic by acknowledging their struggles.

Manliness is not in decline but in 'eclipse,' according to Harvey Mansfield. When society denies or represses this aspect of human nature, it doesn't disappear. Instead, it becomes 'unemployed' and finds expression in harmful ways, contributing to the rise of extremist figures.

The political left often alienates young men by framing them as 'the problem,' while the far-right offers a regressive, misogynistic vision. This failure from both sides to constructively address the genuine challenges young men face leaves them vulnerable to extremist narratives that thrive in the resulting ideological vacuum.

The successful fight for women's equality has inadvertently created a blind spot for the growing problems facing men, such as higher suicide rates and lower college enrollment. This 'elite neglect' from the left has alienated male voters, who feel their problems are ignored or that they are seen as the problem.

Scott Galloway argues the far right recognized the crisis facing young men before the left. While their solutions were regressive—blaming women and minorities—their early diagnosis of the problem created a political vacuum they successfully filled, attracting a disenchanted male demographic.

While the right promotes a flawed version of masculinity, the left's common response is to suggest men adopt more feminine traits. Galloway argues this is ineffective because it fails to offer an aspirational, positive vision of masculinity, leaving many men feeling alienated and unrepresented.

The UFC fight on the White House lawn isn't just entertainment; it's a calculated political move to engage a generation of men who feel unrepresented by traditional, more "proper" government functions, reflecting a strategy to reclaim perceived masculinity in politics.

Senator Cory Booker defines masculinity not by displays of perfection or dominance, which he calls "weakness," but by the quiet devotion of a team player. He equates it to the athlete who shows up first, supports others, and focuses on the team's success over personal acclaim.