The current capital market structure, with its high fees, delays, and limited access, is a direct result of regulations from the 1930s. These laws created layers of intermediaries to enforce trust, baking in complexity and rent-seeking by design. This historical context explains why the system is ripe for disruption by more efficient technologies.

The argument that 'Bitcoin fixes this' ignores human reality. Its volatility and complexity create an insurmountable adoption barrier for the average person. The only practical solution for the masses is holding governments accountable, not mass crypto adoption.

Instead of simply holding Bitcoin, MicroStrategy layered on complex debt instruments like preferred stock. This convolution made it difficult for investors to understand the true risk and preference stack, contributing to the stock trading at a discount to its own assets when sentiment turned. Simplicity is safer.

Products like options or prediction markets for specific metrics (e.g., company earnings) appear complex but can be simpler for investors with a specific thesis. They allow a direct bet on a single variable, avoiding the noise and multiple factors that influence a broad proxy like stock price.

Crypto exchanges and prediction markets attract users by offering a feeling of agency and control, a powerful draw for those who feel the traditional economy is rigged. In reality, these platforms often give users the least amount of actual agency, profiting from a manufactured sense of empowerment.

The current crypto environment mirrors the lead-up to the 2008 financial crisis. 'Good money is chasing after many intrinsically weak assets,' which are then complexly leveraged and integrated into the balance sheets of systemically important institutions, creating a growing, underappreciated systemic risk.

A clear statement from a financial leader like the Fed Chair can instantly create common knowledge, leading to market movements based on speculation about others' reactions. Alan Greenspan's infamous "mumbling" was a strategic choice to avoid this, preventing a cycle of self-fulfilling expectations.

Just as 1700s British aristocrats had lower life expectancies from accessing ineffective but expensive "quack" medicine, today's wealthy investors can access complex financial instruments that often act as financial poison. These products peddle hope but can dramatically increase the odds of ruin, a danger unavailable to ordinary investors.

During a crisis, a simple, emotionally resonant narrative (e.g., "colluding with hedge funds") will always be more memorable and spread faster than a complex, technical explanation (e.g., "clearinghouse collateral requirements"). This highlights the profound asymmetry in crisis communications and narrative warfare.