Large enterprises navigate a critical paradox with new technology like AI. Moving too slowly cedes the market and leads to irrelevance. However, moving too quickly without clear direction or a focus on feasibility results in wasting millions of dollars on failed initiatives.

For marketing leaders, the primary anxiety around AI isn't job replacement. It's the expectation from the board to immediately have a strategy for new capabilities, like "ChatGPT instant checkout," that launched mere hours ago. This creates a constant state of reactive pressure and fear of the unknown.

The true challenge of AI for many businesses isn't mastering the technology. It's shifting the entire organization from a predictable "delivery" mindset to an "innovation" one that is capable of managing rapid experimentation and uncertainty—a muscle many established companies haven't yet built.

Competing in the AI era requires a fundamental cultural shift towards experimentation and scientific rigor. According to Intercom's CEO, older companies can't just decide to build an AI feature; they need a complete operational reset to match the speed and learning cycles of AI-native disruptors.

In the current AI landscape, knowledge and assumptions become obsolete within months, not years. This rapid pace of evolution creates significant stress, as investors and founders must constantly re-educate themselves to make informed decisions. Relying on past knowledge is a quick path to failure.

In the fast-moving AI sector, quarterly planning is obsolete. Leaders should adopt a weekly reassessment cadence and define "boundaries for experimentation" rather than rigid goals. This fosters unexpected discoveries that are essential for staying ahead of competitors who can leapfrog you in weeks.

The fluid nature of AI means traditional moats are unreliable. Defensibility is no longer a static plan but a daily practice of innovation and execution. Even established public companies feel threatened, proving that staying ahead requires constant movement and earning your position every day.

The rapid pace of change in AI renders long-term strategic planning ineffective. With foundational technology shifts occurring quarterly, companies must adopt a fluid approach. Strategy should focus on core principles and institutional memory, while remaining flexible enough to integrate new tech and iterate on tactics constantly.

The market is evolving so rapidly, largely due to AI's influence on buyer behavior and competitive landscapes, that companies can't rely on a static product-market fit. It's now a continuous process of re-evaluation and adaptation every few months.