Believing attribution fights are culturally damaging and unproductive, Hightouch's leadership team has banned them. Instead of arguing over credit, they measure marketing's success by tracking account progression through six defined, data-verifiable pre-opportunity stages, creating a shared view of momentum.
Related Insights
Instead of marketing and sales running separate races with siloed KPIs, a modern GTM model measures the entire journey like a relay. Both teams are measured on how efficiently accounts move through the funnel, focusing on the quality of handoffs and collaborative impact on velocity.
A modern data model revealed marketing influenced over 90% of closed-won revenue, a fact completely obscured by a last-touch attribution system that overwhelmingly credited sales AEs. This shows the 'credit battle' is often a symptom of broken measurement, not just misaligned teams.
Instead of debating multi-touch attribution, first identify the single, independent event that caused a sales rep to engage a prospect. This "trigger" (e.g., demo request, MQL score) reveals the true efficiency of your GTM motions, which is a more fundamental problem to solve.
The question modern attribution should answer is not "Which channel gets credit for this dollar?" but "What are the commonalities across our most successful buying journeys, and how can we replicate them?" This moves from a simplistic, linear view to a more holistic, pattern-based understanding of customer acquisition.
The battle over attribution isn't a personality conflict but a systemic issue. It's caused by measuring marketing on MQLs and sales on closed revenue. Unifying both teams under a single, shared revenue goal eliminates this friction and fosters collaboration.
Average teams measure success in functional silos (sales vs. marketing), leading to finger-pointing. Elite teams remove functions from the equation. They focus entirely on the customer's journey, identifying patterns that lead to pipeline and fixing those that don't, regardless of which department "owns" them.
When legacy first/last-touch metrics reappear, don't debate them. Instead, present a broader analysis of the entire journey. This reveals how a "successful" last touch (e.g., a product trial) might belong to a cohort with a tiny win rate, high acquisition cost, and small deal size, proving its inefficiency.
CloudPay stopped attributing opportunities to single sources like "marketing" or "sales." Analysis showed multiple departments influenced every deal, rendering attribution a source of pointless internal arguments. They still use multi-touch attribution at the campaign level, but not to assign inter-departmental credit.
Attribution models, even multi-touch, are fundamentally designed to answer "Who gets credit?" and often become weaponized internally. Causality analysis asks a more strategic question: "What sequence of events causes a deal to progress faster?" It focuses on optimizing the process, not distributing credit for the outcome.
To justify ABM investment during long sales cycles, you must track and report on leading indicators, not just revenue. Celebrate and communicate intermediate victories like expanding CRM contacts from 5 to 30 in a target account or creating in-depth account plans to demonstrate progress and maintain executive buy-in.