The Fed kept interest rates higher for months due to economic uncertainty caused by Donald Trump's tariff policies. This directly increased borrowing costs for consumers on credit cards, car loans, and variable-rate mortgages, creating a tangible financial impact from political actions.

Most proposed affordability measures like tax credits or subsidies offer only micro-level relief to households and won't change the broader economy. Tariff policy is the significant exception. Lowering tariffs would have a sustained impact by directly reducing inflation, supporting real income growth, and potentially enabling the Fed to cut interest rates.

Economic analysis debunks the political claim that foreign nations pay for tariffs. In reality, there is a near-complete cost pass-through to American buyers. U.S. consumers ultimately shoulder 96% of the tariff burden through higher prices, while foreign firms absorb only a negligible 4%.

Unlike 2022, when stimulus savings allowed consumers to absorb price hikes, the financially depleted middle class now lacks the ability to pay more. This forces them to push back on price increases, creating significant consumer resistance that acts as a powerful, albeit painful, check on a new round of inflation from tariffs or other cost pressures.

While high-income spending remains stable, the next wave of consumption growth will stem from a recovery in the middle-income segment. This rebound will be driven by stabilizing factors like reduced policy uncertainty and neutral monetary policy, not a major labor market acceleration.

If tariffs are reduced following a court ruling, companies will experience immediate cost relief. However, these savings are passed to consumers slowly, over two to three quarters. This delay creates a temporary tailwind for corporate profit margins before prices on the shelf fall.

While larger tax refunds offer a financial lift, low-income households face simultaneous headwinds. The benefit of increased income is at risk of being neutralized by rising costs from tariff-driven inflation and the expiration of Affordable Care Act credits, creating a precarious financial situation for this group.

Contrary to the populist framing of his trade policy, recent analysis reveals that American consumers bear almost the entire financial burden (94%) of tariffs. This policy acts as an unnecessary 2% tax on the economy, reducing prosperity without fostering significant growth or innovation.

A potential Supreme Court ruling curbing the President's AIPAA tariff authority will not impact all consumer goods equally. The effects are highly concentrated in specific categories where these tariffs dominate, such as toys (over 90% AIPAA-related), furniture (over 70%), and apparel (about 60%).