Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Consumers often misrepresent their actions in surveys (the "say-do gap"). To get honest answers, frame questions to be less judgmental. Instead of asking "How often do you go to the gym?" ask "How often do you wish you could go?" to uncover the truth.

Related Insights

Prospects often describe wants (e.g., "a more efficient system"), which are not true problems. Asking about the motivation behind their desire forces them to articulate the underlying pain that actually drives a purchase decision.

Instead of asking direct questions like 'what's important?', prompt customers to recount specific, recent experiences. This storytelling method bypasses generic answers, reveals the 'why' behind their actions, and provides powerful narratives for persuading internal stakeholders.

During customer discovery, don't just ask about current problems. Frame the question as, 'If you had a magic wand, what would the perfect solution be?' This helps users articulate their ultimate desired outcome, revealing profound insights beyond tactical feature requests.

To get a prospect to quantify their pain, don't ask directly. Instead, offer a wide range with an extreme negative scenario, e.g., "I see clients missing pipeline by 5% and others by 70%. Where do you fall?" The high anchor makes them comfortable sharing their true, less severe number.

Standard engagement surveys fail because employees fear answering direct questions about job satisfaction or retention honestly. A more effective approach is to use a proxy question like, "How seen and heard do you feel by your immediate supervisor?" which provides a safer space for truthful responses.

What people claim they will do in surveys often differs dramatically from their actual purchasing behavior. This phenomenon, 'consumer dissonance,' makes survey data on price sensitivity and buying intent highly unreliable. Real-world A/B testing or sales data provides a far more accurate predictor of consumer action.

Stated intentions are unreliable due to the 'say-do gap'. To truly test an assumption, ask for a small but meaningful commitment. This could be a beta sign-up, an email address, or even a direct request to a partner for data. This observes behavior, providing stronger evidence.

During user research, avoid direct questions like 'What do you do?' which prompt idealized answers. Instead, make observational statements like 'I see you are doing this.' This prompts users to correct your assumption with their actual behavior, revealing breakdowns and true user needs more effectively.

When asking for sensitive data like sales numbers, prospects often inflate them. Prevent this by saying, "I know you're not like those companies that always exaggerate their sales numbers, but realistically, how many are you closing?" This uses identity framing to encourage honesty and get you the real data needed to build a gap.

Instead of focusing on tactical issues, ask potential customers what they would wish for if they had a magic wand. This prompts them to describe their ideal, transformative solution, revealing the deeper, more valuable problem you should be solving.