When prompting ChatGPT for scripts, add a final instruction: "tell me why that script should be engaging." This forces the AI to evaluate its own output against strategic goals, leading to better, more thoughtful suggestions and helping the creator understand the underlying strategy.

AI models are trained to be agreeable, often providing uselessly positive feedback. To get real insights, you must explicitly prompt them to be rigorous and critical. Use phrases like "my standards of excellence are very high and you won't hurt my feelings" to bypass their people-pleasing nature.

Instead of spending time trying to craft the perfect prompt from scratch, provide a basic one and then ask the AI a simple follow-up: "What do you need from me to improve this prompt?" The AI will then list the specific context and details it requires, turning prompt engineering into a simple Q&A session.

AI tools rarely produce perfect results initially. The user's critical role is to serve as a creative director, not just an operator. This means iteratively refining prompts, demanding better scripts, and correcting logical flaws in the output to avoid generic, low-quality content.

Users mistakenly evaluate AI tools based on the quality of the first output. However, since 90% of the work is iterative, the superior tool is the one that handles a high volume of refinement prompts most effectively, not the one with the best initial result.

Instead of manually refining a complex prompt, create a process where an AI agent evaluates its own output. By providing a framework for self-critique, including quantitative scores and qualitative reasoning, the AI can iteratively enhance its own system instructions and achieve a much stronger result.

Achieve higher-quality results by using an AI to first generate an outline or plan. Then, refine that plan with follow-up prompts before asking for the final execution. This course-corrects early and avoids wasted time on flawed one-shot outputs, ultimately saving time.

When a prompt yields poor results, use a meta-prompting technique. Feed the failing prompt back to the AI, describe the incorrect output, specify the desired outcome, and explicitly grant it permission to rewrite, add, or delete. The AI will then debug and improve its own instructions.

Leverage AI as an idea generator rather than a final execution tool. By prompting for multiple "vastly different" options—like hover effects—you can review a range of possibilities, select a promising direction, and then iterate, effectively using AI to explore your own taste.