Conventional wisdom suggests attacking an incumbent's weak points. Serval did the opposite with ServiceNow, targeting its core strength: configurability. By using AI to make customization drastically faster and easier, they offered a superior version of the feature that locks customers in, creating a compelling reason to switch.

The most successful AI applications like ChatGPT are built ground-up. Incumbents trying to retrofit AI into existing products (e.g., Alexa Plus) are handicapped by their legacy architecture and success, a classic innovator's dilemma. True disruption requires a native approach.

Startups often fail to displace incumbents because they become successful 'point solutions' and get acquired. The harder path to a much larger outcome is to build the entire integrated stack from the start, but initially serve a simpler, down-market customer segment before moving up.

Startups often fail by making a slightly better version of an incumbent's product. This is a losing strategy because the incumbent can easily adapt. The key is to build something so fundamentally different in structure that competitors have a very hard time copying it, ensuring a durable advantage.

A slightly better UI or a faster experience is not enough to unseat an entrenched competitor. The new product's value must be so overwhelmingly superior that it makes the significant cost and effort of switching an obvious, undeniable decision for the customer from the very first demo.

To build a multi-billion dollar database company, you need two things: a new, widespread workload (like AI needing data) and a fundamentally new storage architecture that incumbents can't easily adopt. This framework helps identify truly disruptive infrastructure opportunities.

While domain experts are great at creating incremental improvements, true exponential disruption often comes from founders outside an industry. Their fresh perspective allows them to challenge core assumptions and apply learnings from other fields.

Incumbents face the innovator's dilemma; they can't afford to scrap existing infrastructure for AI. Startups can build "AI-native" from a clean sheet, creating a fundamental advantage that legacy players can't replicate by just bolting on features.

The founder used a "Napkin Math" approach, analyzing fundamental computing metrics (disk speed, memory cost). This revealed a viable architecture using cheap S3 storage that incumbents overlooked, creating a 100x cost advantage for his database.