The hosts adopt a "tier ranking" format to evaluate college majors based on intuitive, "vibes-based" gut reactions. This approach prioritizes a subjective, holistic feeling about a field over conventional metrics like career prospects or societal contribution.
Related Insights
People with truly unique careers operate from an 'inner scorecard.' They make decisions that align with their internal values and curiosities, even if those choices seem illogical to the outside world, which prioritizes external metrics.
Anthropology is ranked highly not for its consistency but for its immense potential. At its best, it offers unparalleled, S-tier learning experiences. However, it also presents a high risk of getting bogged down in petty, insufferable academic disputes.
As AI automates technical and procedural tasks, professions requiring 'soft skills' like critical thinking, aesthetic judgment, and contextual understanding become more valuable. Fields like engineering may face more direct competition from AI, making a background in humanities a surprisingly strategic long-term career asset.
Technical talent is not the primary driver of resonant creative work. The key ingredient is 'taste'—an unteachable ability to discern what will be emotionally pleasing and impactful to an audience. This intuitive sense separates good creators from great ones.
Engineering is ranked highly not for being exciting, but for its grounding in reality. It is deemed the "least bullshit" field because its success is tied to tangible outcomes where failure is non-negotiable, such as a bridge collapsing.
Political Science is ranked at the bottom tier because its departments are dominated by quantitative analysis over political theory. Students complain they can no longer find theory courses, as the field has been taken over by statistical modeling that often yields little insight.
As AI handles linear problem-solving, McKinsey is increasingly seeking candidates with liberal arts backgrounds. The firm believes these majors foster creativity and "discontinuous leaps" in thinking that AI models cannot replicate, reversing a long-standing trend toward STEM and business degrees.
The hosts justify pursuing an "impractical" major like English by citing a student's philosophy: if the future seems bleak, personal fulfillment from studying a passion outweighs the perceived benefits of a "safer" major. This frames passion as a rational choice in uncertain times.
The best AI models are trained on data that reflects deep, subjective qualities—not just simple criteria. This "taste" is a key differentiator, influencing everything from code generation to creative writing, and is shaped by the values of the frontier lab.
Challenging the "learn to code" mantra, the hosts rank Computer Science poorly. They argue that AI may render basic coding skills obsolete and that the field is responsible for "destroying what's good about the world," reflecting a backlash against tech utopianism.