The actual standards of your organization are not set by posters or mission statements, but by the negative behaviors you permit. If you allow chronic tardiness or underperformance to continue without consequence, you are signaling that this is an acceptable standard for the entire team.
Culture isn't about values on a wall; it's about daily habits enforced by memorable rules. Ben Horowitz argues that rules need "shock value," like A16z's policy of fining partners $10 per minute for being late to a founder meeting. This makes the underlying principle—respect—unforgettable and non-negotiable.
Despite posters championing collaboration, a company's real priorities are revealed through promotion decisions. When individuals who manipulate metrics or undermine teams are advanced, it proves those behaviors are what the organization actually rewards, rendering official values meaningless.
Stated values are meaningless without enforcement. True operational standards are set by the lowest level of performance a leader is willing to accept. If you tolerate messy common areas or late reports, that becomes the actual standard, regardless of the rules.
Culture isn't an abstract value statement. It's the sum of concrete behaviors you enforce, like fining partners for being late to meetings. These specific actions, not words, define your organization's true character and priorities.
Your culture isn't what's on the walls; it's defined by the worst behavior you allow. Firing a high-performing but toxic employee sends a more powerful message about your values than any mission statement. Upholding standards for everyone, especially top talent, is non-negotiable for a strong culture.
A company’s true values aren't in its mission statement, but in its operational systems. Good intentions are meaningless without supporting structures. What an organization truly values is revealed by its compensation systems, promotion decisions, and which behaviors are publicly celebrated and honored.
A company's culture isn't its mission statement; it's the worst behavior it's willing to accept. High-integrity employees will leave a toxic environment, while transactional, self-serving employees who tolerate anything for a paycheck will stay. This selection process causes a continuous erosion of culture.
Allowing a high-performing but toxic employee to thrive sends a clear message: results matter more than people. A leader's true impact and the company's real culture are defined not by stated principles, but by the worst behavior they are willing to accept.
Instead of vague values, define culture as a concrete set of "if-then" statements that govern reinforcement (e.g., "IF you are on time, THEN you are respected"). This turns an abstract concept into an operational system that can be explicitly taught, managed, and improved across the organization.
Culture isn't about values listed on a wall; it's the sum of daily, observable behaviors. To build a strong culture, leaders must define and enforce specific actions that embody the desired virtues, especially under stress. Abstract ideals are useless without concrete, enforced behaviors.