We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
The post-COVID paradigm shift occurred when stimulus moved from Wall Street (QE) to Main Street (direct checks, MMT-style policy). Injecting money directly into the real economy, especially amidst severe supply constraints, was the true catalyst that broke the decades-long disinflationary trend.
Secular inflation is a policy outcome, not an accident. Continuous government spending, debt monetization, and policies aimed at preventing any reduction in aggregate demand are the primary drivers, counteracting the natural deflationary pressures of a crisis and embedding inflation.
Recent inflation was primarily driven by fiscal spending, not the bank-lending credit booms of the 1970s. The Fed’s main tool—raising interest rates—is designed to curb bank lending. This creates a mismatch where the Fed is slowing the private sector to counteract a problem created by the public sector.
The common narrative of the Federal Reserve implementing Quantitative Tightening (QT) is misleading. The US has actually been injecting liquidity through less obvious channels. The real tightening may only be starting now as these methods are exhausted, signaling a significant, under-the-radar policy shift.
Inflation from a supply disruption, like an oil price spike, will eventually fade. It only becomes persistent and embedded in the economy if governments try to 'help' consumers pay for higher costs with stimulus checks, which increases the broad money supply.
Due to massive government debt, the Fed's tools work paradoxically. Raising rates increases the deficit via higher interest payments, which is stimulative. Cutting rates is also inherently stimulative. The Fed is no longer controlling inflation but merely choosing the path through which it occurs.
Contrary to narratives about excess demand, the recent inflationary period was primarily driven by supply-side shocks from COVID-related disruptions. Evidence, such as the New York Fed's supply disruption index accurately predicting inflation's trajectory, supports this view over a purely demand-driven explanation.
Over the past few years, the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve have been working at cross-purposes. While the Fed attempted to remove liquidity from the system via quantitative tightening, the Treasury effectively reinjected it by drawing down its reverse repo facility and focusing issuance on T-bills.
Large, ongoing fiscal deficits are now the primary driver of the U.S. economy, a factor many macro analysts are missing. This sustained government spending creates a higher floor for economic activity and asset prices, rendering traditional monetary policy indicators less effective and making the economy behave more like a fiscally dominant state.
There are two distinct forms of economic stimulus. One targets financial markets, lifting asset prices. The other targets Main Street, boosting consumption. Because the latter demographic holds few financial assets, policies aimed at them may not translate into the market gains investors expect.
The combination of deglobalization, increased defense spending, and persistent fiscal stimulus makes a second major wave of inflation almost inevitable. This structural shift overrides short-term central bank tinkering and will define the next economic cycle, favoring real assets over financial ones.