Kevin Bartlett's story shows how relying on a handshake deal with a trusted, older partner led to a complete loss of his expected multi-million dollar exit. Good intentions and personal relationships are not a substitute for formal contracts when business stakes are high.
Related Insights
In a non-control deal, an investor cannot fire management. Therefore, the primary diligence focus must shift from the business itself to the founder's character and the potential for a strong partnership, as this relationship is the ultimate determinant of success.
The founder’s 76-year-old partner, having been "screwed over" in past deals, acted out of extreme self-preservation. This past business trauma led him to prioritize his own financial security at all costs, even if it meant reneging on promises to his trusted partner.
Don't default to a 50/50 split on day one. Instead, agree to formally discuss equity only after reaching a predefined milestone, like $10,000 in revenue. This allows you to base the split on demonstrated contribution and commitment, avoiding the resentment from premature, misaligned agreements.
A key warning sign was when the founder's business partner stopped communicating with him directly and began consulting his accountant instead. This communication shift signaled a change in priorities from collaborative building to self-interested financial maneuvering before the exit.
The founder's partnership allowed him to build a company without shouldering the initial financial risk. This "halfsies on risk" structure meant he never had true control or ownership, ultimately capping his upside and leaving him with nothing. To get the full reward, you must take the full risk.
Instead of focusing on long-term commitments, ask a potential agency what happens if you want to end the contract early. A truly confident partner, who believes in the results they can deliver, won't try to trap you with hidden fees or restrictive clauses.
When Kevin attempted to buy the company he built, his partner inflated the valuation. The partner knew Kevin was emotionally invested and understood the business's true potential, using that knowledge as leverage to demand an overpayment, a common tactic in internal buyouts.
Home Depot's founder, Bernie Marcus, walked away from a crucial $2M investment from Ross Perot over minor control issues, like what car he drove. He prioritized partner alignment over immediate capital, believing a bad partner would inevitably doom the venture, regardless of the money.
The founder accepted below-market pay for years based on a vague verbal promise to be "treated right" later. This lack of specific terms for his sweat equity ultimately left him with no leverage and no payout, turning years of hard work into a costly lesson.
Granting a full co-founder 50% equity is a massive, often regrettable, early decision. A better model is to bring on a 'partner' with a smaller, vested equity stake (e.g., 10%). This provides accountability and complementary skills without sacrificing majority ownership and control.
