SAS found its well-oiled demand generation marketing was hitting a ceiling of effectiveness. Investing in brand advertising was not just a long-term strategy but a necessary intervention to unlock further short-term growth. The brand halo effect increased the efficiency of all their performance channels, breaking the plateau.

Related Insights

To shift from performance to brand marketing, SAS's CMO built a strategic alliance with the CFO. This involved mutual literacy training (marketing for finance, finance for marketing) and embedding a finance business partner directly into the marketing leadership team, turning finance into a powerful advocate.

Gap's Head of Digital argues that a lack of brand investment forces performance marketing to work harder and become less profitable. Strong brand relevance makes all other marketing efforts more efficient, creating a symbiotic relationship.

High-growth companies must transition from performance to brand marketing. The best marketers make this shift proactively, using experience to anticipate the inflection point. Waiting for data to confirm the need leads to inefficiency and a potential "death spiral."

To justify brand advertising beyond awareness metrics, SAS partnered with LinkedIn. They used a clean room to connect ad exposure directly to won revenue. This data demonstrated that customers exposed to the brand campaign were five times more likely to convert, providing hard ROI data for a traditionally soft metric.

Data shows that adding brand marketing to a performance-driven engine can increase median ROI by 90%. The persistent tension between brand and performance stems from short-termism and the allure of easily measured clicks, creating a false dichotomy between two essential functions.

Effective demand generation is a barbell, requiring strong top-of-funnel brand investment to create awareness and great bottom-of-funnel product marketing to convert interest. Viewing performance marketing as a standalone function and funding it in isolation is like "throwing money at a problem but not solving it."

Relying solely on short-term performance marketing becomes unsustainable. Brand investment acts as the fuel for these channels; cutting it means you must spend progressively more just to maintain the same results, leading to a negative spiral.

Data shows that while combining brand and performance is best, adding brand advertising to a performance-only strategy provides a significantly larger ROI lift than adding performance to a brand strategy. This suggests most marketers are over-invested in performance channels.

Data reveals a 'doom loop' of diminishing returns for companies over-relying on performance marketing. Brand investment acts as a multiplier, improving conversion and efficiency. Campaigns that combine brand and performance see a 90% higher ROI, while performance marketing for a weak brand yields a negative 40% ROI.

In a world demanding short-term results, brand marketing isn't a separate luxury. It is a critical investment that builds top-of-funnel awareness, ensuring that lower-funnel performance tactics have a sufficient audience to convert and ultimately work harder.