YouTube's strategy for AI content extends beyond labeling. CEO Neal Mohan reveals plans to adapt their Content ID system for "likeness detection." This would empower creators to identify AI-generated content using their face or voice and then choose to either have it removed or take ownership and monetize it themselves.

Related Insights

Sam Altman forecasts a shift where celebrities and brands move from fearing unauthorized AI use to complaining if their likenesses aren't featured enough. They will recognize AI platforms as a vital channel for publicity and fan connection, flipping the current defensive posture on its head.

Unlike platforms like YouTube that merely host user-uploaded content, new generative AI platforms are directly involved in creating the content themselves. This fundamental shift from distributor to creator introduces a new level of brand and moral responsibility for the platform's output.

Instead of generic AI videos, InVideo.ai allows creators to upload a short clip of their voice for cloning. This, combined with personal B-roll footage, produces highly authentic, on-brand video content automatically, making AI-generated videos almost indistinguishable from self-produced ones.

The long-term strategy for influencer marketing platform Stormy AI is not just to automate outreach to humans, but to create and deploy its own stable of AI-generated influencers. The founder believes AI UGC will become the norm, allowing brands to spin up armies of custom, AI-driven personas to create content at scale.

Creators will deploy AI avatars, or 'U-Bots,' trained on their personalities to engage in individual, long-term conversations with their entire audience. These bots will remember shared experiences, fostering a deep, personal connection with millions of fans simultaneously—a scale previously unattainable.

To handle royalties for AI-generated music, platforms can analyze the final audio file to algorithmically determine the likely prompt (e.g., "Taylor Swift singing a Gunna song"). This allows for fair royalty splits between the referenced artists, creating a viable monetization path.

Rather than fighting the inevitable rise of AI-generated fan content, Disney is proactively licensing its IP to OpenAI. This move establishes a legitimate, monetizable framework for generative media, much like how Apple's iTunes structured the digital music market after Napster.

The shift from "Copyright" to "Content Detection" in YouTube Studio is a strategic response to AI. The platform is moving beyond protecting just video assets to safeguarding a creator's entire digital identity—their face and voice. This preemptively addresses the rising threat of deepfakes and unauthorized AI-generated content.

Business owners and experts uncomfortable with content creation can now scale their presence. By cloning their voice (e.g., with 11labs) and pairing it with an AI video avatar (e.g., with HeyGen), they can produce high volumes of expert content without stepping in front of a camera, removing a major adoption barrier.

Neal Mohan defends YouTube's revenue split by positioning it as a model where creators bet on their own growth, contrasting with traditional media's upfront payments. For top creators who self-monetize, he frames this as a flexible choice, not a platform weakness, allowing them to select the model that best suits their business.

YouTube Plans to Let Creators Monetize AI-Generated Versions of Themselves | RiffOn