AI enables a fundamental shift in business models away from selling access (per seat) or usage (per token) towards selling results. For example, customer support AI will be priced per resolved ticket. This outcome-based model will become the standard as AI's capabilities for completing specific, measurable tasks improve.

Traditional SaaS companies are trapped by their per-seat pricing model. Their own AI agents, if successful, would reduce the number of human seats needed, cannibalizing their core revenue. AI-native startups exploit this by using value-based pricing (e.g., tasks completed), aligning their success with customer automation goals.

AI is splitting software into two categories: "access products" and "work products." While access tools can stick with seat-based pricing, work products (e.g., AI that processes legal contracts) must adopt outcome-based pricing, as value is tied to output, not the number of users.

The traditional per-seat SaaS model is losing relevance. As AI allows for the completion of discrete workflows, customers expect to pay for the outcome ('do this thing for me'), not for access. This per-task model is a significant competitive advantage against legacy players.

Joe Lonsdale advises established SaaS companies to go on offense with AI. Instead of merely defending their core product, they should build AI agents on top of their platforms to automate customer workflows. This creates new, high-margin revenue streams by helping customers reduce headcount and increase efficiency.

AI tools aren't just making employees more efficient; they are replacing human labor. This allows software companies to move from cheap per-seat pricing to a new model based on outcomes, like charging per support ticket resolved, capturing a much larger share of the value.

AI is moving beyond enhancing worker productivity to completing entire projects, like drug discovery or engineering designs. This shift means software will be priced like a services business, based on the value of the outcome delivered, not the number of users with access.

For tools requiring a new workflow, like Factory's AI agents, seat-based pricing creates friction. A usage-based model lowers the initial adoption barrier, allowing developers to try it once. This 'first try' is critical, as data shows an 85% retention rate after just one use.

In the age of AI, software is shifting from a tool that assists humans to an agent that completes tasks. The pricing model should reflect this. Instead of a subscription for access (a license), charge for the value created when the AI successfully achieves a business outcome.