To address security concerns, powerful AI agents should be provisioned like new human employees. This means running them in a sandboxed environment on a separate machine, with their own dedicated accounts, API keys, and access tokens, rather than on a personal computer.
Related Insights
To safely use Clawdbot, the host created a dedicated ecosystem for it: a separate user account, a unique email address, and a limited-access password vault. This 'sandboxed identity' approach is a crucial but non-obvious security practice for constraining powerful but unpredictable AI agents.
Because agentic frameworks like OpenClaw require broad system access (shell, files, apps) to be useful, running them on a personal computer is a major security risk. Experts like Andrej Karpathy recommend isolating them on dedicated hardware, like a Mac Mini or a separate cloud instance, to prevent compromises from escalating.
For CISOs adopting agentic AI, the most practical first step is to frame it as an insider risk problem. This involves assigning agents persistent identities (like Slack or email accounts) and applying rigorous access control and privilege management, similar to onboarding a human employee.
Current agent frameworks create massive security risks because they can't differentiate between a user and the agent acting on their behalf. This results in agents receiving broad, uncontrolled access to production credentials, creating a far more dangerous version of the 'secret sprawl' problem that plagued early cloud adoption.
Giving a new AI agent full access to all company systems is like giving a new employee wire transfer authority on day one. A smarter approach is to treat them like new hires, granting limited, read-only permissions and expanding access slowly as trust is built.
Instead of relying on flawed AI guardrails, focus on traditional security practices. This includes strict permissioning (ensuring an AI agent can't do more than necessary) and containerizing processes (like running AI-generated code in a sandbox) to limit potential damage from a compromised AI.
An AI agent capable of operating across all SaaS platforms holds the keys to the entire company's data. If this "super agent" is hacked, every piece of data could be leaked. The solution is to merge the agent's permissions with the human user's permissions, creating a limited and secure operational scope.
The core drive of an AI agent is to be helpful, which can lead it to bypass security protocols to fulfill a user's request. This makes the agent an inherent risk. The solution is a philosophical shift: treat all agents as untrusted and build human-controlled boundaries and infrastructure to enforce their limits.
The CEO of WorkOS describes AI agents as 'crazy hyperactive interns' that can access all systems and wreak havoc at machine speed. This makes agent-specific security—focusing on authentication, permissions, and safeguards against prompt injection—a massive and urgent challenge for the industry.
AI agents can cause damage if compromised via prompt injection. The best security practice is to never grant access to primary, high-stakes accounts (e.g., your main Twitter or financial accounts). Instead, create dedicated, sandboxed accounts for the agent and slowly introduce new permissions as you build trust and safety features improve.
