Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Founders largely dislike Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) because they mask the true identity of investors on their capitalization table. This lack of transparency is seen as a risk, leading companies like Anduril to actively combat what they call "SPV hucksters."

Related Insights

Alpha ton Capital publicly announced a $30M investment in Anduril to become a public proxy for the private company. Anduril's CEO, Palmer Luckey, immediately refuted the claim and blocked the share transfer, exposing the high-risk nature of this 'treasury company' strategy without prior, explicit consent.

Founders are warned against being manipulated by late-stage investors who pressure them to strip rights (like pro-rata) from early backers. This disloyalty breaks trust and signals to new investors that the founder can also be manipulated, setting a dangerous precedent for future governance.

Contrary to the idea that all capital is good capital, elite founders strongly dislike SPVs. They want to know exactly who is on their cap table and view SPVs as a risky, obfuscated way to assemble capital that compromises control.

Anduril's COO highlights a dangerous trend of "wildcat" secondary market brokers selling access to company shares they don't possess. These deals often involve multiple layers of SPVs with hidden fees. He warns that many retail investors will discover their shares don't exist during a major IPO, leading to significant financial losses.

To participate in highly competitive late-stage deals, some VCs organize SPVs without management fees or carry. While not directly profitable, this helps the startup fundraise, strengthens the relationship, protects the VC's original investment, and signals access to LPs for future funds.

The firm’s core belief is being a fund *for* founders, trusting them to run their companies without heavy operational input. This hands-off approach gives partners the bandwidth and "permission" to go deep on their own projects, leading to spinouts like Anduril and Varda.

Large LPs are increasingly investing directly in top-tier private tech companies, circumventing traditional VC funds. They gain access through SPVs with minimal fees, creating a competitive dynamic where VCs must justify their value proposition against direct, low-cost access to the most sought-after deals.

Matt Grimm of Anduril highlights that many secondary share offerings are structured as "forward contracts," which he calls notoriously hard to settle and explicitly disallowed by his company's bylaws. This means investors in such SPVs face extreme counterparty risk and may never actually take possession of the shares.

Founders Fund's perk allowing employees to co-invest personally is a clever mechanism to test true conviction. If an investor sponsoring a deal is unwilling to put their own money in, it raises a serious question about their belief in the investment's potential, forcing them to justify why it's a better allocation for LPs than their own capital.

Anduril's co-founder set a precedent for founder transparency by publicly exposing an unauthorized SPV selling forward contracts for company stock. He detailed how the deal violated bylaws and charged exorbitant fees, a powerful warning for investors in private secondary markets.