At IVP, even when a partner is passionate about a deal, the firm encourages them to 'sleep on it' after a debate. This deliberate pause allows the partner to process the team's feedback without pressure, often leading to a more rational assessment of their own conviction and preventing investments driven by emotion rather than collective wisdom.

To ensure robust decision-making, Eclipse requires that if a partner feels strongly against a potential investment, they must join the deal team alongside the champions. This forces a direct confrontation of the risks and ensures that by the time an investment is made, all major concerns have been addressed.

Involve the integration lead early in the deal process to act as a 'red team.' Their role is to challenge the business case and probe the plan with practical, ground-level questions, preventing strategic 'echo chambers' and ensuring the deal is executable.

At the end of an expert call, ask the expert to consider a scenario where your agreed-upon conclusions are incorrect. This prompts them to reveal second and third-order risks and blind spots that may not have surfaced during the main discussion.

Our brains are wired to find evidence that supports our existing beliefs. To counteract this dangerous bias in investing, actively search for dissenting opinions and information that challenge your thesis. A crucial question to ask is, 'What would need to happen for me to be wrong about this investment?'

AI models tend to be overly optimistic. To get a balanced market analysis, explicitly instruct AI research tools like Perplexity to act as a "devil's advocate." This helps uncover risks, challenge assumptions, and makes it easier for product managers to say "no" to weak ideas quickly.

To avoid dangerous groupthink when a deal appears overwhelmingly positive, GSP's leadership actively employs a "think again" process. They encourage dissent and re-examination of assumptions, viewing deals where everyone agrees as potentially the most dangerous.

Even well-intentioned sellers are motivated to close a deal and may present information in the most favorable light. This is often a human behavioral bias, not malicious lying. Acquirers must actively challenge and validate seller statements by testing assumptions and seeking external information.

This advisor's role is not to make decisions but to provide a cool-headed, pragmatic perspective. They test your hypotheses and translate them into practical terms, helping to improve results and limit losses by identifying blind spots before you commit.