VCs are actively deploying capital in anticipation of the IPO window reopening in 2026. Driven by pressure from their own LPs to return capital, they cannot afford to be on the sidelines and are ensuring their portfolio companies are funded and ready to go public.

Related Insights

The long-standing 8-12 year path to IPO is being drastically shortened by AI. Companies can now reach IPO-ready milestones like $100M ARR in just 4-5 years. This compression, combined with a backlog of large private companies, suggests a massive liquidity event is imminent for venture capital, ending the recent drought.

When the IPO window opens, nearly every stakeholder—from bankers and lawyers to VCs and management—is financially motivated to go public. This collective "irrational exuberance" can lead to a rush of mixed-quality companies, perpetuating the industry's historical boom-bust IPO cycles.

While massive, oversubscribed follow-on financings for companies with positive data indicate renewed investor appetite, the true market recovery hinges on the IPO window reopening. Analysts remain deeply divided on whether 2026 will see a significant number of IPOs, suggesting a fragile recovery.

Despite seeing 100x revenue multiples reminiscent of 2021, VCs are not accelerating their fund deployment or rushing back to fundraise. This more measured pace indicates a potential lesson learned from the last bubble, where rapid deployment led to poor vintage performance and pressure from LPs.

Venture capitalist Bruce Booth explains that bankers, lawyers, audit firms, and VCs all have strong financial incentives for a company to go public. This creates systemic pressure that may not align with the company's best long-term interests.

For late-stage startups, securing a pre-IPO round led by a premier public market investor like Fidelity is a strategic move. It provides more than capital; it offers a crucial stamp of approval that builds significant confidence and credibility with Wall Street ahead of an IPO.

As top startups delay IPOs indefinitely, institutional portfolios are seeing their venture allocations morph into significant, illiquid growth equity holdings. These "private forever" companies are great businesses but create a portfolio construction problem, tying up capital that would otherwise be recycled into new venture funds.

The ideal period for venture investment—after a company is known but before its success becomes obvious—has compressed drastically. VCs are now forced to choose between investing in acute uncertainty or paying massive, near-public valuations.

Many long-standing tech companies are going public not because they are strong businesses, but because their venture capital investors need a liquidity event after 15-20 years. Public market investors should be wary of these IPOs, as the underlying companies are often 'dead in the water' with historically poor post-IPO stock performance.

By staying private longer, elite companies like SpaceX allow venture and growth funds to capture compounding returns previously reserved for public markets. This extended "growth super cycle" has become the most profitable strategy for late-stage private investors.