Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

When Lucozade reformulated, they found customers dropped out because they *heard* it had changed, not because they disliked the new taste. This echoes the 'New Coke' disaster, where the core issue wasn't taste, but customers feeling their choice and sense of brand ownership was taken away.

Related Insights

Brands are now combining price hikes with "shrinkflation," a tactic dubbed "maximiniflation." Milka chocolate, for example, raised its price and reduced its bar size, causing a 20% sales drop in Germany. Consumers are now hyper-aware of these dual tactics, making it a critical risk for brand reputation.

Rowell's leadership feared their radical rebrand would confuse customers and make the company unrecognizable. In reality, the change generated significant positive buzz and excitement. This shows the fear of negative reception is often an internal barrier, not an external reality.

When relaunching Lucozade with less sugar, openly discussing the change created a massive negative narrative. For Ribena's relaunch, they avoided mentioning the change and ran a positive campaign instead, leading to sales growth. Don't give consumers a reason to stop loving your brand.

A full rebrand risks alienating loyal customers by erasing a brand's heritage. Lancer Skincare's CMO advocates for a gradual "refresh" that modernizes elements like packaging and messaging while preserving core brand identifiers, ensuring continued recognition and trust.

Many product launches fail because marketers change core messaging too frequently, confusing both customers and their own sales teams. The key is consistency. Instead of constant overhauls, put creative "wrinkles" on the same core message to maintain brand clarity and impact, just as top consumer brands do.

Before worrying an MVP will damage the brand, leaders must validate if the brand is actually beloved by customers. Often, internal fears about brand perception are disconnected from reality, where customers may already be deeply dissatisfied and open to change.

Lancer Skincare's plan for a coordinated rebrand event fell through. The CMO found the resulting gradual evolution was actually superior. This "modernization" felt more organic, allowing them to expand their demographic without the shock of a sudden overhaul.

Coca-Cola failed with ZICO not by changing its core quality, but by stripping away its ability to adapt. Large corporate systems, built for consistency at scale, enforce rigid processes that stifle the very nimbleness that made a challenger brand successful.

The disastrous "New Coke" launch, intended to win taste tests, triggered a massive public outcry that demonstrated the brand's deep cultural power. By bringing back "Coca-Cola Classic," the company inadvertently created the most effective marketing campaign imaginable, reminding consumers of their love for the original and halting Pepsi's momentum.

Coca-Cola thumbnail

Coca-Cola

Acquired·8 months ago

Coke Energy's failure illustrates the "brand permission" paradox. Consumers didn't believe an energy drink could taste like Coke. When the taste was altered to be more like a typical energy drink, it alienated loyalists by not tasting like Coke. The brand was trapped between two conflicting expectations.

Announcing Product Changes Can Alienate Loyalists More Than The Change Itself | RiffOn